I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
This is a compound sentence.
A compound sentence contains at least two independent clauses. An independent clause is a clause that can exist on its own, unlike dependent clauses. In the sentence above, there are two independent clauses:
1. A<span>n éclair—a long, thin, frosted pastry—is traditionally filled with vanilla cream
2. (But) I</span><span>ts flavor can be enhanced with other fillings, such as chocolate, coffee, strawberry, or pistachio</span>
Answer:
growing even though the fertility rate is decreasing
Explanation:
we know about our past all over people had not be educated even their fertility rate ll
