1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
4 years ago
8

Based on this passage, which values seem to be most important to the maori?

History
1 answer:
denis-greek [22]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A). Freedom and Individuality

Explanation:

As per the details and descriptions provided in this passage, the most significant values to the Maori people would be their 'freedom and individuality.' This is clearly reflected from the harsh decision taken by Tü and his brothers to kill their beloved parents 'Rangi and Papa' as they were hindering their sons' liberty and distinctiveness. They were tightly embraced and constricted that there was no space to move out of that shell and lead their own lives. Thus, they decide to kill their parents in order to free themselves. This shows how important 'liberty and individuality' was for the Maori people. Hence, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.

You might be interested in
Each tile describes an aspect of Social Contract Theory. Drag each idea to the portion of the Declaration of Independence which
Lyrx [107]

John Locke was born in 1632 and died in 1702 in England. His life spanned the same period as the English Revolution that redefined British monarchical power.

According to Locke, man lived in a natural state where there was no political or social organization. This restricted his freedom and prevented the development of any science or art.

The problem is that there was no judge, a power above the others who could monitor whether everyone is enjoying natural rights.

So, to solve this power vacuum, men will freely agree to constitute themselves in an organized political society.

Man can directly influence the political decisions of civil society, either through the exercise of direct democracy or by delegating his decision-making power to another person. This is the case with representative democracy, in which citizens elect their representatives.

For its part, the State aims to ensure the rights of men such as life, freedom and private property.

5 0
4 years ago
When did the ottoman empire end.
Xelga [282]

Answer:

Sultan Mehmed VI dissolved the General Assembly of the Ottoman Empire on 11 April 1920

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the united states foreign policy in the middle east changed since the end of the cold war
VLD [36.1K]
On 2 August 1990, the people of Kuwait City awoke at 5am to the sound of Iraqi tanks rolling down their streets. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein intended to annex the small Sheikhdom of Kuwait, Iraq’s “19th province,” and tap its massive oil reserves. The invasion did not come entirely out of nowhere. Iraqi troops were massed at the border as the result of an oil dispute with its tiny neighbor, and the United States tried to persuade Iraq to solve its problems with Kuwait peacefully. This action was the first time one sovereign state had invaded and annexed another since Indonesia annexed East Timor in 1975; and it was the first major challenge to world order since the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall. This chapter examines key events in US foreign policy in the Middle East from Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Iraq in 1990 to Donald Trump’s announcement of US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018. It shows how America’s strong position at the end of the Cold War and the end of Operation Desert Storm in 1991 led to a period of American hyper-involvement in Middle Eastern politics that ultimately weakened its regional standing.

The global reaction to Saddam Hussein’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait was virtually universally negative. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) issued Resolution 660, demanding that “Iraq withdraw immediately and unconditionally all its forces to the positions in which they were located on 1 August 1990.” Saddam Hussein’s blatant act of aggression and territorial aggrandizement put an end to decades of stalemate in the Security Council when the USSR and the US voted together on UNSCR 660.

It was not immediately obvious how the United States would react to Saddam’s aggression; and it was by no means certain that the US had any interest in fighting a war to restore Kuwait’s sovereignty. Congress was divided. The Senate approved the use of force against Iraq by a vote of just 52–47, significantly closer than the 77–23 approval of the 2003 Iraq War. President George H.W. Bush saw an opportunity to establish a “new world order” in which territorial aggrandizement was a product of the past, and adherence to global norms was the wave of the future. He supported a war and it was his decision to make.

Bush wanted a grand coalition operating with UN approval, not a purely American intervention. UNSCR 678 passed on 29 November 1990. It gave Saddam Hussein “one final opportunity” to withdraw from Kuwait. If he did not, the resolution, “Authorize[d] Member States… to use all necessary means” to compel him. “Operation Desert Storm” began on 17 January 1991. Nearly every country in the world joined the coalition – Yemen backed Iraq and Jordan remained neutral. Americans fought alongside 31 diverse countries’ armed forces. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Japan, South Korea, and Germany were the major funders of the war effort. In the end, the US Congress’s General Accountability Office found that Desert Shield and Desert Storm were, “fully financed from allied contributions without using US taxpayer funds” (Conahan 1991, 12). The Warsaw Pact did not provide support, but it did not interfere. The zero-sum world had ended, and the Warsaw Pact dissolved itself on 1 July 1991.

Desert Storm ended on 28 February 1991. Saddam Hussein was still president on 1 March. President Bush and Brent Scowcroft, Bush’s national security advisor, said of the decision not to remove Saddam Hussein from power, “Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream… and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs…. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq…. Had we gone the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land” (“Bush on Iraq” 1998, par. 3). The world would later learn just how accurate that assessment was.

The defeat of Saddam Hussein is often described as the peak of American power and global influence. One headline called it, “the pinnacle of American military supremacy” (Blair 2016). It resulted in the establishment of new American bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia (bases that were soon used to establish “no fly” zones to protect Iraq’s Kurdish and Shia populations), and record personal popularity for President Bush. Bush decided to use the high standing of the United States, and his personal popularity, to bring an end to the Israeli/Arab conflict.

United States support for Israel has been a consistent feature of US foreign policy in the Middle East for more than 40 years. The US/Israel relationship is often portrayed as unwavering, but there are periods of tension and stark disagreements.

6 0
2 years ago
ParcA
marysya [2.9K]

The correct matches are that at the time of dissolution of the Soviet Union, The United States welcomed it as the end of the Cold War, and at the Invasion of Panama, the United States decided to overthrow a foreign head of state.

<h3>What noteworthy events occurred in the United States throughout the 1980s and 1990s?</h3>

The Soviet Union was dissolved in the early 1990s, and the United States interpreted this as the end of the Cold War, as the Soviet Union had been the United States' adversary in that conflict.

The invasion of Panama by the United States began in 1989 and ended in 1990, with the goal of deposing Panama's president, Manuel Noreiga.

The correct matches are:

  • Dissolution of the Soviet Union – The United States welcomed it as the end of the Cold War.
  • Invasion of Panama – The United States decided to overthrow a foreign head of state.

Learn more about the United States, refer to:

brainly.com/question/8147900

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Need help! Please and thank you
Lana71 [14]

conseguir una vida perra nadie quiere ver la maldita puesta de sol como tu foto de perfil.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is American literature of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries different from the literature written in Britain during t
    8·1 answer
  • What were some short term effects of the courts decision in the slaughterhouse cases?
    15·1 answer
  • Which president is most closely associated with the Nineteenth Amendment and women's suffrage?
    11·1 answer
  • Who wrote the humorous novel Pantagruel, published in 1532, which poked fun at the established order?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the North Vietnamese and Vietcong's war strategy? A. Attack the Americans in large military con
    5·2 answers
  • Why is it important to remember the lessons of World War II and the Holocaust?
    9·2 answers
  • Where did the ideas for the U.S constitution come from
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Jefferson struggle with the purchase of Louisiana? What was his decision in the end regarding the purchase?
    15·1 answer
  • What were Americans willing and not willing to do to help the Allied Powers as WW II began to progress?
    11·1 answer
  • For what reasons were many colonies granted independence after World War II? Check all that apply
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!