For every cubic yard, it equals to 27 cubic feet.
So, could have this fraction
And we want to convert 3 cubic yards into cubic feet.
We can express 3 cubic yards as
Now multiply the
fraction by the second fraction or the reciprocal of the second fraction to cancel out the yards^3 units.
So, 3 cubic yards to equal to 81 cubic feet.
Answer:
Therefore the ball strikes the ground 5.98 s after kick.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that , a ball is kicked in the air. The height of the ball can be calculated using the equation 
where h is height in feet and t is time in second.
When the ball touches the ground then the height will be zero.
i.e h(t)=0
Therefore
Since -2≠0 then 
[The solution of a quadratic equation ax²+bx+c=0 is
here a=8, b=-32 and c=-95]
![\Rightarrow t =\frac{-(-32)\pm\sqrt{(-32)^2-[4\times8\times(-95)]} }{2\times8}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20t%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B-%28-32%29%5Cpm%5Csqrt%7B%28-32%29%5E2-%5B4%5Ctimes8%5Ctimes%28-95%29%5D%7D%20%7D%7B2%5Ctimes8%7D)
Therefore t= 5.98 or -1.98
since time can not be negative So , t=5.98 s
Therefore the ball strikes the ground 5.98 s after kick.
Answer:
7 / 28
Step-by-step explanation:
7 / 28 = 0 . 28
Answer:
With a correlation coefficient of 0.109 you can not be confident at all; this is about as close to a random guess you could get.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lines of best fit are used to try to make a correlation (relationship) about data that will either be positive (uphill), negative (downhill) or no correlation (points are scattered). Correlation coefficients based off of a line of best fit will fall between -1 and +1 where -1 would represent a perfect negative relationship and +1 would represent a perfect positive relationship. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no relationship. So, if your data shows a correlation coefficient of 0.109, which is closest to 0 on a number line, then you can't be sure that your data has a very close relationship.
