Answer:
Option B) Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 333
p = 48% = 0.48
Alpha, α = 0.01
Number of women belonging to union , x = 149
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a two-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.273079
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported.
B. Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Answer:x = 8, y = 5
Step-by-step explanation:The sum of two numbers is 13. Two times the first number minus three times the second numberis 1. If you let x stand for the first number and y for the second number, the two numbers are: A. x = 8, y = 5
Answer:
x=5
Step-by-step explanation:
x+5 = -3x+25
Add 3x to each side
x+3x+5 = -3x+3x+25
4x +5 = 25
Subtract 5 from each side
4x+5-5 = 25-5
4x = 20
Divide each side by 4
4x/4 = 20/4
x =5
Hey Jay,
Since we can't see the graphs, we can't be entirely sure, but given that we are trying to model the population size of a species of bird that is slowly going extinct. I would say the best graph would be a line graph. Line graphs show changes over time so this would be the best graph to use. Hope this helped!
Cheers,
Izzy
