Answer:
$114,338
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be billed when 1,400 professional labor hours used
But before that determine the actual per hour salary and budgeted indirect cost per hour
Actual per hour salary
= Total actual salary ÷ Total actual professional hours
= ($110,000 × $20 + $30,000× 10) ÷ (60,000)
= ($2,200,000 + $300,000) ÷ (60,000)
= $41.67
And, the budgeted indirect cost per hour is
= $200,000 ÷ $50,000
= $40
Now the amount that should be billed is
= 1,400 hours × ($41.67 + $40)
= $114,338
Explanation:
Based on the given conditions, formulate;
75000- 60000= 15000
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
June 1 Beginning inventory 20 units at $19 = $ 380
June 7 Purchases 70 units at $20 = 1,400
June 22 Purchases 10 units at $23 = $230
Cost of goods available for sale = $2,010
On June 30, units on hand = 30 units
Cost of Ending inventory:
= (20 units × $20) + (10 units × $23)
= $400 + $230
= $630
Total cost of goods sold:
= Cost of goods available for sale - Cost of Ending inventory
= $2,010 - $630
= $1,380
According to the claim, the difference between output current and potential GDP is known as the inflationary gap.
<h3>What GDP means?</h3>
Gross domestic product, also known as GDP, is one of the most popular. It is frequently quoted in reports by authorities, financial institutions, and the financial industry as well as in newspapers, on news channels, and in publications. It is now frequently used as a benchmark for measuring the strength of both national and global industries.
<h3>What is GDP and how is it calculated?</h3>
GDP is calculated as private consumption plus domestic product plus government investment plus (exports – imports). The country's national statistical office often uses the international standard to compute GDP.
To know more about GDP visit:
brainly.com/question/15682765
#SPJ4
Answer:
An excise subsidy has only a substitution effect since the subsidy artificially lowers the price of the subsidized good causing the consumer to increase consumption of the good, but no income effect.
Explanation:
The above is true due to the fact that the consumption of goods increases. This could have been reduced had it been that, there was never any excise subsidy on those goods.