Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is false to conclude that on crucial issues such as this, it is more important to gather information through the informal organization, as opposed to the formal organization because f<u>ormal organizations are designed to achieve crucial goals through the collective work of the individuals who are its members. They rely on a division of labor and hierarchy of power and authority to ensure that the work is done in a unified and efficient manner. while the primary function of informal organizations is basically to maintain cultural values and the provision of social satisfaction for its members.</u>
Answer:
nonprofit distributing
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the board members are practicing nonprofit distributing. This term refers to an organizational structure in which the profit the organization makes is reinvested in services to grow the business as opposed to being distributed to the shareholders. Which is what the company in this scenario is doing by using the money they have made in order to hire a new skillfull CEO.
Answer and Explanation:
- Closing Balance (Retained earning ) of 31 Dec 2018 is called Opening Balance of 1 Jan 2019 , i.e. $42,100
- There is no particular information provide for 1 Jan 2018 .So, assume there is Zero balance of retained Earning
- Calculation of retained earning of 31 Dec 2017
Retained earning $42,100
Less: revenue during the year $19,400
Add: Expenses During the year $9,800
<u>Add : Dividend $500 </u>
Retained earning on 31 Dec 2017 $33,000
- Retained earning is a temporary account So, $33,000 is balance of Retained earning At 30 June 2018.
The kettle falls five case illustrate a weakness of a
federal system in such a way that f<span>ederalism limits
political power and that it depends on compliance of state.</span>
<span>The federal system also aggravates the efficiency in awareness of Policies and its implementation.
The kettle falls five case was very surprising.</span>
Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
All of the above are correct.
For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.
Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.
Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.
Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.
They are all true.
