Answer:
The future value is $6,894.21
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Dominic Joseph deposits $5,000 in a new savings account. The account pays 5.5 percent interest compounded annually.
To calculate the future value, we need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
PV= 5,000
i= 0.055
n=6
FV= 5,000*(1.055)^6= $6,894.21
The house will most likely go to her Nephew.
Answer:
Purchase decision process
Explanation:
A purchase decision process is defined as the thought process that goes into buying a certain product. This thought process include the buyer identifying a need, creating options, seeing different brands and then finally buying the product.
Purchase decision could be either minor or major. Purchasing things like tea, toothpaste, etc require minor decision processes while buying a house or piece of land involves major decision processes.
As in the question, Becky now has to under purchase decision process as to buying soccer cleats for her daughter. This decision will involve buying a brand that won't shrink as a result of weather changes or wear out easily, etc
I hope this helps.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.