The English and French settled in unclaimed lands on the Atlantic Coast.
- The English focused on colonizing the Atlantic Coast.
- The English settlers establish 13 colonies in unclaimed land.
- The French also claimed land on the Atlantic coast.
- The land claim by the French was called New France.
- New France was the area colonized by France in North America.
- English settlers established colonies and were able to trade with Britain by providing cash crops, natural resources, etc.
- France trappers entered New France for fur pelts of deer, bear and beavers.
Therefore we can conclude that the English and French colonized North America and claimed land.
Learn more about "Atlantic Coast" here:
brainly.com/question/17945988
I would say the people of central America would be descendants from native groups, such as the Aztecs, Mayans, etc., as well as the Spaniards.
Answer:
Indigenous groups and Spanish
Answer: President Martin van Buren
Explanation: President Martin van Buren refrained from annexing Texas after the Mexicans threatened war.
Answer:
Iran was independent, and Britain controlled trade in southern Iran
Explanation:
A Sphere of Influence is a region where some country or organization has some sort of exclusivity meant to serve the interests of powers outside the borders of the organization or country that controls it. The second and third options don't fit and seem to be more of a colonial situation. The first one doesn't really say anything. The fourth, though, clearly states that there was control over one area by an organization outside the borders. Hope This Helps! Brainliest, Please?
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think teaching has changed all that much in 2000 years to be truthful. Jesus is said to have been a master teacher. He used very few methods: parables, learned references, complete and utter faith in the rightness of the Father. He was successful.
Socrates used questions. His students were never let off the hook. If they faltered in even the smallest detail, he pursued them with a tenacity that forced them to defend themselves. He lived more than 2000 years ago. He was successful -- so much so that Athens feared his influence.
Modern teachers carefully follow a line of thought from Grade 1 to Grade 12. Their objective is vastly different perhaps than the other two. They are interested in preparing students for what they will face when they leave the protection of the school system. You may not agree, but I think they are successful.
What do these examples have in common?
In my opinion the very vast majority of teachers have two qualities in common: they care about the people they teach; they care about the subject matter they are teaching or the skills or the training or whatever you want to call it. Most feel strongly about what they are doing.
Few teachers will ever make the Frobes Billionaire's List if any at all. But they are content with enough.
