They introduce many supporting details
The statement best compares the two passages in that the first passage hints that the family should not trust Walter with money or business matters, and the second passage confirms it.
<h3>What are the comparisons between both the passages?</h3>
The first passage intimations that no trust should be placed in Walter regarding business matters and Beneatha and Ruth respond to this by interchanging diverted looks, which allow that this is an open lie.
And in the second passage, we get the confirmation of what is hinted in the first when the Mother, after finding out what happened, starts propelling her son, in anger, not recognizing him as her son, until Beneatha interacts.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about passages, refer:
brainly.com/question/23662376
The answer is C) To entertain. Hope this helps.
A struggle within the characters mind, usually to create suspense in the novel
Answer:
A: Indignant
Explanation:
He feels as though he is treated unfairly and is showing annoyance and anger over his unjust treatment.
