Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
The angle is in the first quadrant
Step-by-step explanation:
For angles greate than360°,subtract
360° from the angle until the angle is less than 360°. Hence
405° = 405° - 360°
= 45°
The angle is in the first quadrant. Since the first quadrant can still take as much as 90°
Answer:
a = -5
Step-by-step explanation:
15 - a = 20
Move the constant of 15 to the other side by subtracting it.
-a = 5
Divide by -1 to make a positive.
a = -5
Check.
15 - (-5) = 20
15 + 5 = 20
20 = 20
Answer: 24 square units
Explanation: The diagonals are 4+4 = 8 and 3+3 = 6 units long. Multiply the diagonals to get 8*6 = 48. Then divide this in half to get 48/2 = 24.
An alternative is to find the area of one smallest triangle, and then multiply that by 4 to get the total area of the rhombus. You should find the area of one smallest triangle to be 0.5*base*height = 0.5*4*3 = 6, which quadruples to 24.
-q/-7≥-1
q/7≥-1
q≥-1*7
q≥-7
Solution: q≥-7 or q∈[-7,+∞).