Hello there,
The answer to your question is shaping
Hope this helps :))
~Top
Answer:
quasi-strict scrutiny approach
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the approach most likely to be adopted for this case is quasi-strict scrutiny approach. This refers to a statutory classification that deals with gender or legitimacy. Which is exactly what this is case is in regards to, as they are filling a suit on the basis that they are being treated differently based on their gender.
Answer:
Bond Price = $1294.65063 rounded off to $1294.65
Explanation:
To calculate the price of the bond today, we will use the formula for the price of the bond. Assuming the bond is an annual bond, the coupon payment, number of periods and annual YTM will be,
Coupon Payment (C) = 1000 * 0.08 = 80
Total periods (n) = 18
r or YTM = 0.054 or 5.4%
The formula to calculate the price of the bonds today is attached.
Bond Price = 80 * [( 1 - (1+0.054)^-18) / 0.054] + 1000 / (1+0.054)^18
Bond Price = $1294.65063 rounded off to $1294.65
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
Answer: $204,800
Explanation:
When a good is shipped FOB shipping point, it means that the buyer assumes responsibility for the goods as soon as the goods reach the place they will be shipped from. The purchase from Pelzer should therefore be included in inventory because it has already been shipped.
A good shipped FOB Destination means that the buyer only assumes responsibility after the goods have been delivered to them. As the sale to Alvarez was still in transit, it is still the responsibility of Marigold and should be included in inventory.
Inventory is therefore:
= 155,000 + 28,000 + 21,800
= $204,800