Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Reverse-hierarchy theory".
Explanation:
- It argues that training seems to be the level-down (high) driven mechanism that starts at strong-level areas of that same visual cortex and progresses downwards to feedback areas since these are not enough, which would have a better noise-to-noise proportion.
- This type of learning could be described as an enhancement of the ability to execute particular perceptual activities that are caused by experience or practice.
Therefore, this theory is the right answer.
Native Americans lived here way before anyone else
Answer:
Almost 70%
Explanation:
Almost 70% of licensed teen drivers who use drugs regularly report they ''drug and drive."
Lol who is smashin pumpkins
