1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KATRIN_1 [288]
3 years ago
7

g According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 11% of children in the United States lived with at least one grandparent in 2009 (USA TOD

AY, June 30, 2011). Suppose that in a recent sample of 1630 children, 228 were found to be living with at least one grandparent. At a 5% significance level, can you conclude that the proportion of all children in the United States who currently live with at least one grandparent is higher than 11%? Use both the p-value and the critical-value approaches.
Mathematics
1 answer:
sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

z=\frac{0.14 -0.11}{\sqrt{\frac{0.11(1-0.11)}{1630}}}=3.871  

Critical approach

z_{crit}= 1.64

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.11 or 11%

P value

We are conducting a right tailed test so then the p value is given by:

p_v =P(z>3.871)=0.000054  

And we see that is a very low value compared to the significance level of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.11.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=1630 represent the random sample selected

X=228 represent the children were found to be living with at least one grandparent

\hat p=\frac{228}{1630}=0.140 estimated proportion of children were found to be living with at least one grandparent

p_o=0.11 is the value to verify

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

p_v represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to verify if the % of children who live with at least one grandparent is higher than 11%, so then the system of hypothesis is .:  

Null hypothesis:p\leq 0.11  

Alternative hypothesis:p >0.11  

The statistic for this case is given by:

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

z=\frac{0.14 -0.11}{\sqrt{\frac{0.11(1-0.11)}{1630}}}=3.871  

Critical approach

we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulate 0.05 of the area in the left and for this case this value is:

z_{crit}= 1.64

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.11 or 11%

P value

We are conducting a right tailed test so then the p value is given by:

p_v =P(z>3.871)=0.000054  

And we see that is a very low value compared to the significance level of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.11.

You might be interested in
1. Last year a fishing license cost $52.00. This year the license will cost $46.80.
Talja [164]

Answer:

10%

Step-by-step explanation:

First, get the drop in value by deducting the price this year from last year's price.

Value decrease=$52.00-$46.80=$5.20

To express it as a percentage, we divide it by the original price which was $52.00 then multiply by 100 hence the percentage decrease will be

\frac {5.20}{52.00}\times 100=10\ %

Therefore, the price decreases by 10%

6 0
3 years ago
The line shown above has a y-intercept of? I need help fast please
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

y-intercept is 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The line connects to the y-axis at 1

6 0
2 years ago
Gabriele's Pie Shop sold 80 pies last month: 7/10 were apple pies and 1/10 were peach pies. How many pies were neither apple nor
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

16 pies were neither apple nor peach.

Step-by-step explanation:

8/10, or 4/5 of the 80 apple pies were either apple or peach, which 4/5 of 80 is 64. The remaining pies will be neither apple nor peach. 80 - 64 = 16.

7 0
3 years ago
Evaluate the expression 3x² + 2x - 4 for x =-2.
marin [14]

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

3x² + 2x - 4

3(-2)² + 2(-2) - 4

3(4) - 4 - 4

12 - 4 - 4

12 - 8

= 4

4 0
3 years ago
Tom taxis charges a fixed rate $4 per ride plus $0.50 per mile Carla cabs does not charge a fixed rate but charges $1.00 per mil
RSB [31]

at 8 miles they are the same amount after that Carlas cab is more money than tims
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Kirsten and molly are on a 3-day bike ride.The entire route is 156 miles. On the first day,they bilked 64miles. On the second da
    9·1 answer
  • Tamara is creating a model of a rectangle. She has 26 inches of yellow ribbon to use for the border of the rectangle. She wants
    15·1 answer
  • Let g(x) = x2 + 2 and h(x) = 2x2 - 5x + 11<br> a) g(4)
    13·2 answers
  • A repair bill for you car is $553 the parts cost $265 the labor cost is $48 per hour. Write and solve an equation to find the nu
    9·1 answer
  • How do you find the original price when given the sale price and the percent of the discount
    11·1 answer
  • Can anyone explain how to get to the answer ? I’ll mark brainliest! Please
    7·1 answer
  • An appliance store sells lamps at $95.00 for two. A department store sells similar lamps at five for $250.00. Which store sells
    6·1 answer
  • I really need help with this! Thank you!!
    13·1 answer
  • Which number line shows how to find 4 and the opposite of 4?
    7·2 answers
  • Are you a Christian? If so, please join my go o gle cla s s r oom. You don't have to be a Christian. If you want to know more ab
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!