Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that necessitates courts to follow historical cases when creating a ruling on a similar current or future case. Stare decisis safeguards that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, except overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the US Supreme Court. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided". The US common law system has a integrated system of determining legal matters from the principle of stare decisis and precedent. A past ruling or judgment on any circumstance is known as a precedent. Stare decisis commands that courts look to precedent when overseeing an on-going case with similar circumstances.
Democracy is technically young men killing each other in war. Freedom is the will of not being under laws or rules. Democracy is the law of not being under other rules. Freedom, is just eventful till new rules and laws come.
Answer:
Observational study
Explanation:
An observational study is a type of study in which individuals are observed and certain measures are measured but there's no intend to affect the actual outcome. In other words, no treatment is given to the individuals and there's no intervention done by the researcher.
In this example, the study aims to evaluate the percent of adults whose right cerebral hemisphere is larger than the right hemisphere. 20 people come and have their brains scanned. Then, the scan is analyzed to identify which hemisphere is larger.
In this study, we can see how <u>individual's brains were observed and some measures were taken but there was no treatment given to them</u> (the researchers were only interested in knowing which hemisphere was bigger).
Thus, this is an example of observational study.
Answer:
Thurgood Marshall, is the right answer.
Explanation:
- Thurgood Marshall was a layer from America. In the year 1967, with his appointment as an associate justice of the Supreme Court, he became the first African American Justice of the United States' Supreme Court.
- He played a significant role in ending the legal segregation in the United States.
- Once he completed his graduation from Lincoln University in 1930, Marshall attempted to take admission to the University of Maryland but due to the segregation policy of the School, he had to turn away.
- However, he graduated from the Howard University Law School in the year 1933.
- He then set up his private in Maryland, he soon established his "reputation as a lawyer for the “little man".
Answer:
Social responsibility.
Explanation:
Social Responsibility can be defined as an ethical responsibility of an individual or a group of people or an organization that recognizes his/her responsibility for the cause of society on a larger scale. A person who is socially responsible holds himself/herself obligated to work for the betterment in the society.
<u>In the given case, Haagen-Dazs is an example of </u><u>social responsibility</u><u>, as it is working for the betterment of the society on a larger scale. They considered the problem of disappearing of honey bees as a social threat that will hamper in the pollination of food and came forward to work on the cause by launching a microsite to create awareness in the society for the same. And also, by launching a campaign on twitter</u>.
So, the correct answer is social responsibility.
