Answer:
They attribute this to power struggles within the lab hierarchy.
Explanation:
In the scientific areas, research is usually carried out, and the scientists in charge of these studies that have the best reviews usually obtain better benefits than the researchers who are unnoticed. Therefore, it is essential to achieve good research results, although this often contributes to a power struggle between collaborators.
In laboratories, this struggle of power can be observed within the scientific hierarchy; this occurs among scientists with more experience, with those who have more time in the area, those who obtain better results, and those who want to achieve better benefits.
For example, in the case of anthropologists, Jona Salk observed that in some research he gave more importance to some results than others, he tried to show his power in the laboratory hierarchy and benefit some scientists.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
d They are the building blocks of the economy and are what people use create ideas, to produce goods and services.
Explanation:
After reading this question I think the best answer choice would be d. Seeing that factor of production are interwoven together to create economic growth.
Sometimes we lose when we win
Based on research analysis, the data the tests on the purified substance produce is a "<u>negative result in chemical tests to observe proteins, but a strongly positive result in a chemical test to observe DNA."</u>
In a further research analysis, the data surveyed support the hypothesis that DNA is the transforming factor by revealing the fundamental composition of the purified substance transforming principle that nearly corresponded to DNA in its percentage of nitrogen and phosphorous.
Therefore, these classical experiments show that DNA is the genetic material.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the purified substance in the experiment shows a correlation with DNA.
Learn more about DNA here: brainly.com/question/4701650
