Theyre chosen by the state
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Answer:
b. when restraining forces are removed, driving forces will produce change
Explanation:
Force field analysis is a theory of Kurt Lewin in his contribution to change management.
This model suggests how change agents may diagnose the forces that drive and restrain proposed organizational change. It draws from this that change agents can only cause change to happen if they eliminate forces restraining order resisting this change.
Lewin list four forces in his research: change forces, driving forces, restraining forces and resisting forces, suggesting that in order for a change to happen the driving forces have to be more than the restraining forces and an equilibrium means no change.
Answer:
Comm as Transaction
Explanation:
Comm as Transaction -
It is the method of communication , where there is simultaneous exchange of message or information between the sender and the receiver, is referred to as comm as transaction.
In this method , the receiver and the sender , both are called the communicators , and the role of the of the sender and receiver change as the conversation starts .
Hence, from the given scenario of the question,
The correct term is Comm as Transaction .
