Answer:Target and train for specific career promotions which fit your needs.
Explanation: its a my friend
Answer:
P-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject null hypothesis.
Explanation:
Here,
Sample size = n = 120
Sample proportion = p = 0.6500
Population Proportion =
= 0.5
Level of significance = α = 0.02
<u />
<u>Step 1:
</u>
: p = 0.5
: p < 0.5 (Left tailed test)
<u></u>
<u>Step 2:
</u>
The critical vale is = 2.0537
<u></u>
<u>Step 3: </u>
The test statistic is,
z = 
<u>Step 5:
</u>
Conclusion using critical value: Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value, we fail to reject null hypothesis.
<u>Step 6: </u>
Conclusion using P-value: Since the P-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Answer:
The correct answer is $56,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Average checks per day = $14,000
Days in clearing = 4 days
Interest rate = 0.018% per day
So, we can calculate the company's float by using following formula:
Company's Float = Average checks per day × Days in clearing
By putting the value in the formula, we get
Company's Float = $14,000 × 4
= $56,000
Answer:
A. The proposed new project would have more stand-alone risk than the firm's typical project.
Explanation:
Answer:
Manson Industries
The total cost savings that Manson will realize by buying the assembly part instead of making it is:
($14,700), showing that more costs will be incurred.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Make Buy
Variable cost per unit $5 $6
Fixed cost per unit 2 2
Total cost per unit $7 $8
Total units required 14,700 14,700
Total costs $102,900 $117,600
Cost saving = ($14,700)
b) Based on the above calculations, it benefits Manson more to produce the part internally than to buy from an outside supplier. There is a cost difference of $1 because the fixed costs will still be incurred whatever decision is taken.