Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Answer:
Explanation:
Moral Development theory was given Lawerence Kohlberg.
it consists of three stages.
Pre-conventional:
stage 1: punishment and obedience orientation :
In this stage, the child modeled as he is good to avoid punishment. if someone punished him/ her do wrong things.
For example: Usually, children try to show themselves that they are good at their level but when their parents punished them at something then they did wrong to satisfy their ego.
stage 2: Instrumental relativist orientation:
In this stage, the children start to believe that there is not only one viewpoint behind the reason but other people's viewpoints also do matter and believe that different people have different viewpoints.
Conventional :
stage 3: Good boy; nice girl
stage 4: Law and order orientation
Post-Conventional:
stage 5: Social contract orientation
stage 6: Universal ethical principal
Answer:
Voter Turnout
Explanation:
According to my research on different political terminology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term being mentioned is called Voter Turnout. This is the percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election. When political scientists try to explain this they try to predict what the turnout is going to be, in other words how many people are actually going to show up to vote in an election based on different factors.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
