1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Y_Kistochka [10]
3 years ago
11

In the early 1900s, doctors and lawyers usually belonged to which group?

History
2 answers:
Leno4ka [110]3 years ago
7 0
In the early 1900s, doctors and lawyers usually belong to : Middle class

Well, actually it's true even until now. In people's mind, doctor and lawyers all suppose to be rich. But actually there are a lot of them that also stayed in middle class level salary.

Hope this helps
rjkz [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In the early 1900s, doctors and lawyers usually belonged to which group?

The correct answer is, the middle class.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The difference between -8 and -2
horsena [70]

Answer: 6

Explanation:

-8-(-2) is +6

Mark me as brainliest if this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A Scythian nomad of Central Asia would have also been known as _______ an Aryan a Hun a Touman a Saka
Firlakuza [10]
A Scythian nomad of Central Asia would have also been known as a) Saka. This is because they spoken an Euro-Iranian language and Saka relates to an Iranian root word which means nomad. The Scythian nomads were a large group of Eurasian-Iranian nomads who lived in the central Eurasian steppe area.
7 0
3 years ago
Que elementos favorecieron o limitaron el desarrollo de mexico despues de la revoluci??n?
SCORPION-xisa [38]
In English,

The primary goal of the Mexican Rebellion was purely the takeover of the Díaz tyranny, but that comparatively simple politically aware movement widened into a foremost economic and social turmoil that foretold the vital character of Mexico’s 20th-century experience. During the lengthy struggle, the Mexican people established a sense of individuality and determination, perhaps unparalleled by any other Latin American nation. Many reforms had been developed by 1940 when the goals and purpose of the revolution were established as guiding principle for future Mexican policies and procedure. The viciousness of 1910 presented a clear start to the Mexican Revolution, but scholars contradict on an end, as a resolution mostly use the year 1920, but some end it with the 1917 constitution or measures in the 1920s, and still, others debate that the insurgency slowly tattered until 1940.


In Spanish,

<span>El objetivo principal de la Rebelión mexicana fue simplemente la toma de posesión de la tiranía de Díaz, pero ese movimiento relativamente simple y políticamente consciente se amplió hasta convertirse en la mayor confusión económica y social que predijo el carácter vital de la experiencia mexicana del siglo XX. Durante la larga lucha, el pueblo mexicano estableció un sentido de individualidad y determinación, quizás sin paralelo en ninguna otra nación latinoamericana. Se habían desarrollado muchas reformas para 1940, cuando se establecieron los objetivos y el propósito de la revolución como principio rector de las futuras políticas y procedimientos mexicanos. La brutalidad de 1910 presentó un claro comienzo para la Revolución Mexicana, pero los académicos contradicen el final, ya que una resolución usa principalmente el año 1920, pero algunos lo terminan con la constitución de 1917 o medidas en la década de 1920, y aún otros debaten que el la insurgencia se rasgó lentamente hasta 1940.</span>


8 0
3 years ago
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the pros and cons of having electricity , and the light bulb during the 19th century /////helpppppp meeee
Alika [10]

Answer:

While you may have some incandescent bulbs lying around, once they're gone, they will be gone forever. And you probably won't mourn their inefficiency; since about 90 percent of the energy produced in the bulbs is actually heat instead of light, they are huge energy wasters. While they generally last about 1,500 hours, this is still only a fraction of the lifespan of CFLs. These are lit by an electric current sent through a tube that contains argon and a small amount of mercury gases. These gases generate invisible ultraviolet light, which commingles with a fluorescent coating on the inside of the tube to produce light.

Explanation:

I REALLY HOPE THIS HELPS I'M HORRIBLE WHEN I COMES TO PROS AND CON!!!!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does the freedman burea matter
    13·1 answer
  • redkooladeuke are you there its hard to talk to you through comments somethings wrong with brainly need your help
    10·2 answers
  • In the early and mid-1800s, much of the northern economy depended on a: unskilled labor supplied by immigrants. b: goods manufac
    7·2 answers
  • BRAINLEST!!! PLZ HELP!!! Which of the following identifies the central idea of the text, regarding the Harlem Renaissance? Quest
    12·1 answer
  • Civil service positions were created so that federal jobs would be given to what type of people
    11·1 answer
  • What was patraick Henry's famous words
    14·1 answer
  • Which movement strengthened the authority of the Catholic church by using reason to argue Christian theology? A) Humanism B) The
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a major goal of George Washington as
    14·1 answer
  • nem 1-6, correct the run-on sentences by turning each into two complete sentences , The Pope gave a rousing speech he encouraged
    15·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 10<br> In a democracy, how is rule of law regarded?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!