I think it would be 40% but i am not fursher i took 150 244 300 and 50 added them and subtracted them from 1240 and that gave me 496 496 % of 1240 is 40%
Answer:
73
Step-by-step explanation:
Bob
20-4=16
Billy 20+69=89
89-16=73
Ok so let me help you with this. Here is the procedure:
<span>r² = x² + y² = 8² + 6² = 100
r = 10
x = r cosθ
y = r sinθ
sinθ = y/r = 6/10 = 3/5
</span>Hope this is what you are looking for
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)