All categories

3 years ago

When might a limited warranty be a better choice than a full warranty?

2 answers:

4 0

Choosing a limited warranty may be a better choice (compared to a full warranty) when you are unsure of your plans in the future and may want to cancel your purchase.

Also, f you don't have a lot of money at the moment, but you still want to be covered by a warranty, choose a limited warranty as they cost less.

Paul [167]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A limited warranty can be more economical than a full warranty. If the conditions excluded by the limited warranty are either not very expensive or are exceedingly unlikely to ever arise, but you still want to have some protection for your purchase, a limited warranty can be a better deal.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

4/5w-12=2/3w<br> what is the step by step answer to those equation?

Mariulka [41]

Kulay, there is no such thing as a "step by step answer" here. You seem to want a "step by step solution."

I must assume that by 4/5 you actually meant (4/5) and that by 2/3 you meant (2/3). Then your equation becomes:

(4/5)w - 12 = (2/3)w.

The LCD here is 5*3, or 15, so mult. every term by 15:

12w - 180 = 10w.
Add 180 to both sides, obtaining 12 w - 180 + 180 = 10w + 180.

Then 12w = 10w + 180. Simplifying, 2w = 180. What is w?

4 0

3 years ago

Find the exact value for x leaving your answer as a surd with a rational denominator where appropriate :

lesya [120]

Answer:

x = 10 $\sqrt{3}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the sine ratio in the right triangle and the exact value

sin60° = $\frac{\sqrt{3} }{2}$ , then

sin60° = $\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}$ = $\frac{x}{20}$ = $\frac{\sqrt{3} }{2}$ ( cross- multiply )

2x = 20 $\sqrt{3}$ ( divide both sides by 2 )

x = 10 $\sqrt{3}$

3 0

3 years ago

Which binomial expressions are factors of 2x^3+5x^2-x-6

Julli [10]

GCF= 1

FACTORED VERSION = (X-1) (2X+3)(X+2)

7 0

3 years ago

Please help thanks ❗

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

The Two Column Proof is given below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

$\overline{MP} \cong \overline{MN}$

$\overline{PO} \cong \overline{NO}$

To Prove:

∠ P ≅ ∠ N

Proof:

In Δ MPO and Δ MNO

STATEMENT REASONS

1. MP ≅ MN 1. Given

2. PO ≅ NO 2. Given

3. MO ≅ MO 3. Reflexive property

4. ΔMPO ≅ ΔMNO 4. Side-Side-Side congruence test}

5. ∠MPO ≅∠MNO 5. Corresponding parts of congruent Triangles

i.e ∠ P ≅ ∠ N ..................Proved

3 0

3 years ago

Kendra drew the graph of G(x). She noticed that it was possible to draw a horizontal line that intersected the graph in two poin

r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer: option A. The inverse of G(x) is not a function.

Because that means that for some values of x, say x = a and x = b, G(a) = G(b) = Z, then you cannot tell whether the value that generates Z corresponds to a or b.

3 0

3 years ago