Answer:
opening, body, close
Explanation:
<u>Opening:</u>
This part will consist of your general introduction. You will tell the receiver of the message about who you are along with the reason you choose him/her for the message.
<u>Body:</u>
This contains the core of your business messages. It might include your business proposals or some sort of rearrangement for a certain cooperative effort.
<u>Close:</u>
This part will be filled with conclusion. It is also very advisable to thank the receiver for his/her time along with a signature for background check purpose.
Answer:
correct option is D) The vertical axis crossing point cannot be calculated since the cash inflows are in perpetuity
Explanation:
given data
hair salon spends = $1,000,000
increase cash flow = $220,000 per year
to find out
what dollar value should the NPV profile cross the vertical axis
solution
we know that discount rate is = 0 %
as sum of cash flow is infinite
because cash flow = $220000
cash flow is here perpetual
so we can say that correct option is D) The vertical axis crossing point cannot be calculated since the cash inflows are in perpetuity
Answer:
beginning inmediately: $ 140,095.127
after a year: $ 152,703.688
with a salvage value: $ 148,227.912
Explanation:
We need to find the PMT of 980,000 dollars being ordinary annuity or annuity-due discounted at 9%
Annuity-due:
PV $980,000.00
time 10
rate 0.09
C $ 140,095.127
Annuity:
PV $980,000.00
time 10
rate 0.09
C $ 152,703.688
If there is a salvage value, we discounted from the lease value:
980,000 - present value of salvage value:
Maturity $68,000.0000
time 10.00
rate 0.09
PV 28,723.93
980,000 - 28,724 = 951,276
<u>Now we calculate the PMT:</u>
PV $951,276.00
time 10
rate 0.09
C $ 148,227.912
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the statement that is not possible would be Kelly having a comparative advantage in repairing cars and in cooking meals. This is because a when having a comparative advantage you are better at something but at the same time you are giving up other opportunity costs. Therefore in this scenario Kelly can only have a comparative advantage at either repairing cars or cooking meals but not both.