1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgesh-ka [11]
4 years ago
14

-8p^2+8p+7=9 how do i find the discriminant

Mathematics
1 answer:
m_a_m_a [10]4 years ago
5 0
The discriminant can be found using the formula b^2-4ac 

First put your equation in standard form, where all your values are on one side, and just add f(x) or y in front of your equation. 
y= 8p^2-8p+2

The first value of your equation is a   (a=8)
The second term of your equation is b  (b=-8)
The last term of your equation is c  (c=2)

Plug in the values to the discriminant equation b^2-4ac 
You might be interested in
7+9+6+9+9+7+9+4+2+8+7+9+10
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
USE G O O G L E you will get your answer quicker than a jiffy on a stick:)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the domain and range of f(x) = (1/6)x + 2? domain: ; range: {y | y > 0} domain: ; range: {y | y > 2} domain: {x |
Trava [24]

Sir you posted question and answer? or are providing examples of preferred format?

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Linear Algebra question! Please help!
kozerog [31]

Answers:

  1. false
  2. false
  3. true
  4. false
  5. True

==================================================

Explanation:

Problem 1

This is false because the A and B should swap places. It should be (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}.

The short proof is to multiply AB with its inverse (AB)^{-1}  and we get: (AB)*(AB)^{-1} = (AB)*(B^{-1}A^{-1}) = A(B*B^{-1})*A^{-1} = A*A^{-1} = I

The fact we get the identity matrix proves that we have the proper order at this point. The swap happens so that B matches up its corresponding inverse B^{-1} and the two cancel each other out.

Keep in mind matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. So AB is not the same as BA.

-------------------------

Problem 2

This statement is true if and only if AB = BA

(A+B)^2 = (A+B)(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A(A+B) + B(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB + BA + B^2

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 ... only works if AB = BA

However, in most general settings, matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. The order is important when multiplying most two matrices. Only for special circumstances is when AB = BA going to happen. In general,  AB = BA is false which is why statement two breaks down and is false in general.

-------------------------

Problem 3

This statement is true.

If A and B are invertible, then so is AB.

This is because both A^{-1} and B^{-1} are known to exist (otherwise A and B wouldn't be invertible) and we can use the rule mentioned in problem 1. Make sure to swap the terms of course.

Or you can use a determinant argument to prove the claim

det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B)

Since A and B are invertible, their determinants det(A) and det(B) are nonzero which makes the right hand side nonzero. Therefore det(A*B) is nonzero and AB has an inverse.

So if we have two invertible matrices, then their product is also invertible. This idea can be scaled up to include things like A^4*B^3 being also invertible.

If you wanted, you can carefully go through it like this:

  1. If A and B are invertible, then so is AB
  2. If A and AB are invertible, then so is A*AB = A^2B
  3. If A and A^2B are invertible, then so is A*A^2B = A^3B

and so on until you build up to A^4*B^3. Therefore, we can conclude that A^m*B^n is also invertible. Be careful about the order of multiplying the matrices. Something like A*AB is different from AB*A, the first of which is useful while the second is not.

So this is why statement 3 is true.

-------------------------

Problem 4

This is false. Possibly a quick counter-example is to consider these two matrices

A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } B = \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{bmatrix}

both of which are invertible since their determinant is nonzero (recall the determinant of a diagonal matrix is simply the product along the diagonal entries). So it's not too hard to show that the determinant of each is 1, and each matrix shown is invertible.

However, adding those two mentioned matrices gets us the 2x2 zero matrix, which is a matrix of nothing but zeros. Clearly the zero matrix has determinant zero and is therefore not invertible.

There are some cases when A+B may be invertible, but it's not true in general.

-------------------------

Problem 5

This is true because each A pairs up with an A^{-1} to cancel out (similar what happened with problem 1). For more info, check out the concept of diagonalization.

5 0
2 years ago
A statement that is true from a rhombus
Talja [164]
A rhombus has two sets of parallel sides. A rhombus has two pairs of angles  
8 0
3 years ago
5. An animal shelter finds homes for cats and dogs. The shelter can handle up to
irina [24]

Answer:

Who’s gay?

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Solve this problem and give the total cost
    12·1 answer
  • One angle of an isosceles triangle measures 52°. Which other angles could be in that isosceles triangle? Choose all that apply
    12·1 answer
  • Is (-7,3) a solution to this inequality? Y- 4x &lt; - 5. Show your work or describe what you did to decide the answer.
    6·1 answer
  • Use the equation Y = 3/27x-54 +5.
    10·2 answers
  • Someone please help!!
    10·2 answers
  • If you fill out both of these you can get Brainliest and some 5 star and thanks!
    7·2 answers
  • 6 less than the product of 5 and a number <br> A. 5-6n<br> B. 6+5n<br> C. 5(n - 6)<br> D. 5n-6
    7·2 answers
  • The number of copies made each week by teachers at Lamley High School follows a bell-shaped distribution with a
    5·1 answer
  • Aidan buys 3 bicycles for $252. Each bicycle was the same price.
    6·2 answers
  • 2-5x=7x-12<br> what is the answer to this solution
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!