Answer:
The randomization distribution is created under the assumption that H₀: p = 0.1
The randomization distribution will also be centred at 0.1
Step-by-step explanation:
If the distribution was truly random, 1 out of 10 students will choose math as his/her favorite subject.
This means that the randomization will have the null hypothesis saying that the proportion of students who will choose maths as their favourite subject = 0.1
Mathematically, it'll be written as
The null hypothesis is given as
H₀: p = 0.1
And the randomization distribution will be centred at 0.1 too.
The alternative hypothesis will now prove the theory they're looking to see in the question that
Hₐ: p < 0.1
Hope this Helps!!!
Answer:
<h2><em>
2(3s-14)</em></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the angles ∠ABF=8s-6, ∠ABE = 2(s + 11), we are to find the angle ∠EBF. The following expression is true for the three angles;
∠ABF = ∠ABE + ∠EBF
Substituting the given angles into the equation to get the unknown;
8s-6 = 2(s + 11)+ ∠EBF
open the parenthesis
8s-6 = 2s + 22+ ∠EBF
∠EBF = 8s-6-2s-22
collect the like terms
∠EBF = 8s-2s-22-6
∠EBF = 6s-28
factor out the common multiple
∠EBF = 2(3s-14)
<em></em>
<em>Hence the measure of angle ∠EBF is 2(3s-14)</em>
Answer:
h(4) = –12
Step-by-step explanation:
⇒ What the question is asking is that when the function h(n) = –2n(2) + 4 is h(4), what will the function repond to when solving for h(4)? So, solve for the function h(4):
h(4) = –2n(2) + 4
⇒ Since n was replaced with 4 in the function h(4), substitute any n for 4 into the function:
h(4) = –2(4)(2) + 4
⇒ Simplify:
h(4) = –16 + 4
⇒ Solve:
h(4) = –12
<u>Answer:</u> h(4) = –12
<em>I hope you understand and that this helps with your question! </em>:)
I can’t really see it get a clear picture
Answer:
<em>Hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question</em>
answer : There is not convincing statistical evidence to suggest that the proportion of customers who order dessert at each restaurant is not the same based on family classification. ( E )
Step-by-step explanation:
To arrive at this conclusion we will determine the Null and alternate hypothesis
<em>H0 : Number that orders dessert is same based on family classification given</em>
<em>Ha : Number that orders dessert is not the same based on family classification given </em>
from the question the p-value of Chi-square test is 0.092 > 0.05 hence we will fail to reject the null hypothesis. therefore we can conclude that
There is not convincing statistical evidence to suggest that the proportion of customers who order dessert at each restaurant is not the same based on family classification