Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
The correct answer is True. When ownership of the items passes to the customer, revenue is realised. In addition to the requirements for determining when control transfers, a reporting entity must also satisfy certain additional requirements for a customer to have achieved control in a bill-and-hold arrangement.
A bill and hold sales arrangement allows for payment in advance of the item's delivery. This is a sales agreement when a product seller invoices a consumer up front but doesn't actually ship the thing until later.
In a bill and hold transaction, the vendor does not deliver the purchased goods to the customer, but the associated income is still recorded. Under this structure, revenue cannot be recognised until a number of severe requirements have been satisfied. The possibility of falsely recognising revenue too early exists otherwise.
To learn more on bill and hold arrangement
brainly.com/question/14009218
#SPJ4
The GIM suggested for the 14-unit property is 8.
Data and Calculations:
16 units 12 units 4 units
Selling price $1,200,000 $960,000 $480,000
Gross income $150,000 $120,000 $48,000
Gross Income Multiplier 8 8 10
A 14-unit apartment building's suggested GIM = 8
A property's gross income multiplier (GIM) measures the property value by dividing the property's sale price by its gross annual rental income.
Thus, the GIM suggested for the 14-unit property is <em>8.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/14477119
Answer:
The interest revenue will Savor record in Year 1 on this lease at 9% is $347,697
Explanation:
Present value of Lease Payment = $4,561,300
Less: First Payment on Jan 1, 2018 = $698,000
Remaining Balance = $3,863,300
Interest Revenue for Year 1 at 9% = $3,863,300 × 9%
Interest Revenue for Year 1 at 9% = $347,697
Answer:
ADJUSTED BOOK BALANCE
Bank balance $59,549 Book balance $61,709
+ Deposit in transit $4,250 Interest earned $33
- Outstanding checks <u>$2,075</u> Bank service fees <u>$18</u>
Adjusted book <u>$61,724</u> <u>$61,724</u>
balance
