Answer:
It is based on dogmatism.
Explanation:
While Skepticism is a term in philosophy, which is considered as a behavior, or a form of doubt in relation to the truth of a particular thing or situation. It stated that absolute certain knowledge is impossible.
On the other hand, Unmitigated skepticism which is a form of skepticism, claims that categorically and dogmatically it knows that no one knows anything. This appears contradictory and apparently self-defeating.
Hence, among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical position is because it dogmatically accept a position or knowledge that no one knows anything, which is self-defeating and contradictory.
The country that controlled Canada in 1803 is the United Kingdom.
Answer:
The answer is that <u>Fay is most likely liable for INSIDER TRADING.</u>
Explanation:
Insider trading which is the unfair advantage someone has over others in the purchase of a given securities in the stock market.
This illigal practice affords the individual the opportunity to purchase stocks at a cheaper rate while selling it off at a higher rate after it must have gone public.
In the case of Fay, he is likely liable for insider trading as a result of the prior information he got from Dhani.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer:
Process Evaluation
Explanation:
A process Evaluation is to which a program is operating as intended by assessing ongoing program operations and determining whether the target population is being served. Such evaluation helps the program staff members to identify needed interventions and change program components to improve service.
