A heart transplant is an operation during which<span> a failing or </span>pathological<span> heart is replaced with a healthier, donor heart.Heart transplants </span>are<span> performed </span>once different<span> treatments for heart </span>issues<span> haven't worked.</span>
A heart transplant is not an appropriate option if :
→<span>You're an advanced age that would interfere with the ability to recover from transplant surgery.
</span>→You have another medical condition that might<span> shorten your life, </span>despite<span> receiving a donor heart, </span>like a heavy excretory organ<span>, liver or any </span>respiratory organ.
→<span>You have </span>a serious<span> infection.</span>
→<span>You have a recent personal </span>case history<span> of cancer.</span>
→<span>You are unwilling or unable </span>to create mode<span> changes necessary </span>to stay<span> your donor heart healthy, </span>like<span> not drinking alcohol or not smoking
</span>
<span>The heart surgery carries the risk of many complications like death,bleeding,blood clots and heart attack.
</span><span>One of the most common risks after having a heart transplant is that your body might reject the donor's heart.
</span>There is also a possibility that the walls of the arteries in your heart could become thicken and harden, which can lead to to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV).
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
As part of a study in auditory perception, a group of students was made to listen to a low-volume music track. When they first put on their headphones, they almost couldn’t hear anything. But as they became more attentive, the sound gradually became clearer. This is an example of _________.
a. retinal disparity
b. pitch increase
c. sensitization
d. subliminal stimulation
Answer:
This is an example of C. sensitization.
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, the sound was not altered. Its volume, its pitch - everything remained the same. There was, however, an alteration in people's perception of the sound, and that is due to a process known as sensitization. Sensitization happens when a certain stimulus becomes more effective because of repetition or continuation. That is, because people kept on listening to the sound, even though it was low, they were able to hear it after a while.
It was just a sequence and it was just and so it was vary climatic
Answer:&
Explanation:nsbxusbejsjxjwbeishdb
