Answer:
this one`s been up for debate for awhile now.
1. it depends on the organism
learning about an organism could be considered 'easier' to study in different ways. for example, if you are studying marine life, you will most likely have to keep it in a water habitat to watch it alive. If you are studying a land species, then watching from it`s natural habitat will give you more accurate results. sometimes the environment can affect an organisms internal systems more than you may think. this leads into my second point.
2. it depends on what you are trying to study
if you are trying to learn about the mating process, seasonal activity, migration, or external behavior, then monitoring it from it`s natural habitat or an area that is a close copy is your best option. but if you are looking into studying internal organs/systems or cells, then in <em>most</em> cases, the organism will need to be taken out of its natural habitat. only in very careful situations is it left in a habitat during examination.
Answer:
Explanation: The first Australopithecus fossil was found in a lime quarry at Tuang, it was found by Raymond Dart in November 1924.
<u>Answer:</u>
Although statements are not given in the question, we could make the most possible deduction as follows:
The allele for purple flowers is dominant whereas allele for white flowers is recessive.
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to the question,
- Purple flower plant was crossed with white flower plant.
- All offsprings have purple flowers.
Here we have one possibility that both parents were homozygous but in their own traits. <u>Purple flower</u> plants were "PP" and white <u>flower plants</u> were "pp" So, the <u>first progeny</u> (direct offsprings) would have "Pp". So, as per considerations, purple is dominant allele which will mask the recessive allele thus defining the color of all offsprings as purple. However, further cross of their generation will definitely end up into purple and white flowers (3:1) but this condition is not mentioned in the statement.
Answer:
Each of the following constitutes a repudiatory breach of contract justifying termination at common law:
Explanation:
Answer:
Housing development and shopping mall
Explanation:
housing development and shopping mall may cause wildlife habitats destroyed. also the land being destroyed is not unenvironmetally friendly
