All categories

2 years ago

Evaluate 8r -rs when r=6 and s=s

Mathematics

1 answer:

tankabanditka [31]2 years ago

3 0

Well since 8(6) = 48 then 48 - 6s = x, I suppose correct me if i'm wrong. I do hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

Given 9______

34kurt

7____ is the one that couldn't used to complete a table of eqiuvalent ratios

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Follow the rule to find the next three numbers in the pattern. Describe the pattern using the terms even and odd Add 5: 1,6,11 _

inessss [21]

1,6,11,16,21,26 is what you would get if you add 5.

4 0

2 years ago

Hurry!!!Between which two values would 75% of the data represented on a box plot lie? Check all that apply.

sp2606 [1]

the answers are <span>the lower quartile and the maximum and The minimum and the upper quartile.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

(7x10^-6) (8x 10^-5)

DENIUS [597]

Answer:

56x^2 + 10^-11

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply the 7x and 8x and you get 56x^2

multiply the 10^-6 and 10^5-5 and you get 10^-11

8 0

2 years ago

A shoe manufacturer was investigating the weights of men's soccer cleats. He felt that the weight of these cleats was less than

aleksklad [387]

Answer:

The conclusion is that the researcher was correct

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The sample size is $n = 13$

The sample mean is $\= x = 9.63$

The standard deviation is $s = 0.585$

The significance level is $\alpha = 0.05$

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o : \mu = 0$

The Alternative Hypothesis is $H_a = \mu < 10$

The test statistic is mathematically represented as

$t = \frac{\= x - \mu }{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }$

Substituting values

$t = \frac{9.63 - 10 }{\frac{0.585}{\sqrt{13} } }$

$t = - 2.280$

Now the critical value for $\alpha$ is

$t_{\alpha } = 1.645$

This obtained from the critical value table

So comparing the critical value of alpha and the test value we see that the test value is less than the critical value so the Null Hypothesis is rejected

The conclusion is that the researcher was correct

6 0

3 years ago