1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mekhanik [1.2K]
3 years ago
11

Show that there do not exist scalar c1 c2 and c3 c1(-2,9,6)+c2(-3,2,1)+c3(1,7,5)= (0,5,4)​

Mathematics
1 answer:
fredd [130]3 years ago
5 0

This is the same as showing the following system of equations doesn't have a solution:

\begin{cases}-2c_1-3c_2+c_3 = 0 \\ 9c_1 + 2c_2 + 7c_3 = 5 \\ 6c_1 + c_2 + 5c_3 = 4\end{cases}

or in matrix form,

\begin{bmatrix}-2&9&6\\-3&2&1\\1&7&5\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}c_1\\c_2\\c_3\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\5\\4\end{bmatrix}

The quickest way to check if there is a solution is to check whether the coefficient matrix is invertible. If its determinant is 0, then it is not invertible.

And the quickest way to show that the determinant is 0 is by observing that the third row is a linear combination of the first two rows:

(-2, 9, 6) - (-3, 2, 1) = (-2 + 3, 9 - 2, 6 - 1) = (1, 7, 5)

So there are indeed no such scalars <em>c₁</em>, <em>c₂</em>, and <em>c₃</em>.

You might be interested in
Suppose that an automobile manufacturer designed a radically new lightweight engine and wants to recommend the grade of gasoline
yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

B) 4.07

Step-by-step explanation:

First we need to calculate the mean of all the data, which is the same as the mean of the means of each grade of gasoline:

Regular    BelowRegular   Premium   SuperPremium

39.31             36.69                38.99             40.04

39.87            40.00                40.02             39.89

39.87            41.01                  39.99             39.93

X1⁻=39.68    X2⁻= 39.23       X3⁻= 39.66    X4⁻=  39.95

Xgrand⁻ = (39.68+39.23+39.66+39.95)/4 = 39.63

Next we need to calculate the sum of squares within the group (SSW) and the sum of squares between the groups (SSB), and the respective degrees of freedom):

SSW = [ (39.31-39.68)² + (39.87-39.68)² + (39.87-39.68)² ] + [ (36.69-39.23)² + (40.00-39.23)² + (41.01-39.23)² ] + [ (38.99-39.66)² + (40.02-39.66)² + (39.99-39.66)² ] + [ (40.04-39.95)² + (39.89-39.95)² + (39.93-39.95)² ] = [0.2091] + [10.2129] + [0.6874] + [0.0121] = 11.12

SSW =  11.12

Degrees of freedom in this case is calculated by m(n-1), with m being the number of grades of gasoline (4) and n being the number of trial results for each one (3), so we would have 4(3-1) = 8 degrees of freedom

SSB = [ (39.68-39.63)² + (39.68-39.63)² + (39.68-39.63)²] + [ (39.23-39.63)² + (39.23-39.63)² + (39.23-39.63)² ] + [ (39.66-39.63)² + (39.66-39.63)² + (39.66-39.63)² ] + [ (39.95-39.63)² + (39.95-39.63)² +(39.95-39.63)² ] = [0.0075] + [0.48] + [0.0027] + [0.3072] = 0.7974

SSB =  0.80

For this case, the degrees of freedom are m-1, so we would have 4-1 = 3 degrees of freedom

Now we can establish the hypothesis for the test:

H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4

The null hypothesis states that the means of miles per gallon for each fuel are the same, indicating that the drade of gasoline does not make a difference, therefore our alternative hypothesis will be:

H1: the grade of gasoline does makes a difference

We will use the F statistic to test the hypothesis, which is calculated like follows:

F - statistic = (SSB/m-1) / (SSW/m(n-1)) = (0.80/3) / (11.12/8) = 0.19

We know that the level of significance we are using is α = 0.05, so to find the critical value F we need to look at some table of critical values for the F distribution for the 0.05 significance level (like the attached image). Then we just need to look fot the value that is located in the intersection between the degrees of freedom we have in the numerator (horizontal) and the denominator (vertical) of the statistic (3 and 8). That critical value is:

Fc = 4.07

3 0
3 years ago
Write down mrs Chauke balance on the 25 march 2021 in words​
Yanka [14]

Answer:

A line passes through the points (-4,1) and (-3,3). This line can be modeled by the equation y

3 0
3 years ago
The time it takes to drive to Joliet is 6 hours more than half the time it takes to drive to Davenport. It takes 8 hours to driv
Molodets [167]
It takes 8 hours to drive to Joliet, and that's 6 hours more than half the time it takes to drive to Davenport. So, I did 8-6 which equals 2. So 2 hours is half the time it takes to get to Davenport, which means it takes 4 hours to get to Davenport. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help plzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

y=8x-3

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Math help please i have discalcula
user100 [1]

Answer:

x=4y,3x=4y,y=4x,4x=3y

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • sheilas cell phone plan consists of a monthly rate and a fee for each minute she talks over 500 minutes per month. Her july bill
    7·1 answer
  • What is the area of a rectangle that has lenghts of 2/5 foot and 3/8
    14·2 answers
  • √-225 • √-36 . show work.
    10·1 answer
  • How many pounds is equivalent to 168 ounces
    8·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me
    10·2 answers
  • An object with a mass of 3.2 kg has a force of 7.3 newtons applied to it. What is the resulting acceleration of the object?
    5·1 answer
  • 12-1/5r = 2r +1 solve for r
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me this a important test and I’m not good at math please explain step by step so I can learn the formula for once
    15·1 answer
  • How do solve this?<br><br> 9g &lt; -1/2
    10·2 answers
  • Which object would weigh closest to 1 ton? ​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!