Strict Liability: Strict liability is where even if a product was safely designed, was properly manufactured, and contained an appropriate warning, a manufacturer or retailer of a product may be liable for injuries resulting from use of the product simply because the product caused those injuries.
Answer:
there is no advantage
Explanation:
other then the fact that they were there when the crime was commited
Answer:
No, on the contrary, I am totally against the granting of extraordinary powers to any political leader, whatever the issue. On the contrary, I think that every government official must have limited powers, controlled by the other branches of government. In this way, they will not be able to exceed their prerogatives, affecting the freedoms and rights of citizens.
This law is unlikely to be constitutional.
The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.
