The retailer was asking the designers to agree to <u>Exclusive distribution</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Exclusive distribution is characterized as the arrangement under which a participant is a supplier and provider. It specifies that the seller can not offer their service or item to some other group. It attaches the contract that the commodity must be distributed to an exclusive seller. The retailer asks developers for exclusive supply as per the situation specified in the discussion. Retailer does not want the jewelry design to be sold to any other outlet or retailer for successful sale. Thus agreement on this matter is suggested by the retailer.
As not everybody can afford designer items, those who can, typically buy such items to increase their self-esteem, and/or view it as an accomplishment. Also, many will do so in a way to view themselves in a higher class than others.
Answer: $2,398.55
Explanation:
The deposit at the end of year one would have been compounded by 2 years at the end of year 3. The second year deposit would have compounded by 1 year and the third year deposit would not have compounded at all.
The future value at the end of 3 years is;
= (500 * ( 1 + 11%)²) + (750 * ( 1 + 11%)) + 950
= $2,398.55
<em>The question might not be the exact same but you can use this as a reference. </em>
Answer:
$6,689
Explanation:
As we know that the inventory should be recorded at cost or net realizable value which ever is lower
Particulars Item Units Unit Cost Net Realizable Value LCNRV
Minolta 7 $175 $157 $157
Canon 11 142 176 $142
Vivitar 14 130 111 $111
Kodak 17 120 132 $120
So, the amount of ending inventory is
= 7 units × $157 + 11 units × $142 + 14 units × $111 + 17 units × $120
= $1,099 + $1,562 + $1,988 + $2,040
= $6,689