Answer:
yea only ofc
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The other side was decreased to approximately .89 times its original size, meaning it was reduced by approximately 11%
Step-by-step explanation:
We can start with the basic equation for the area of a rectangle:
l × w = a
And now express the changes described above as an equation, using "p" as the amount that the width is changed:
(l × 1.1) × (w × p) = a × .98
Now let's rearrange both of those equations to solve for a / l. Starting with the first and easiest:
w = a/l
now the second one:
1.1l × wp = 0.98a
wp = 0.98a / 1.1l
1.1 wp / 0.98 = a/l
Now with both of those equalling a/l, we can equate them:
1.1 wp / 0.98 = w
We can then divide both sides by w, eliminating it
1.1wp / 0.98w = w/w
1.1p / 0.98 = 1
And solve for p
1.1p = 0.98
p = 0.98 / 1.1
p ≈ 0.89
So the width is scaled by approximately 89%
We can double check that too. Let's multiply that by the scaled length and see if we get the two percent decrease:
.89 × 1.1 = 0.979
That should be 0.98, and we're close enough. That difference of 1/1000 is due to rounding the 0.98 / 1.1 to .89. The actual result of that fraction is 0.89090909... if we multiply that by 1.1, we get exactly .98.
The answer is <span>D.∠3
If you use a proctor you can see they measure the same
</span>
Answer:
<u>P (E1) = 1/2 or 50%</u>
<u>P (E2) = 3/13 or 23%</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Let's review the information given to us to answer the question correctly:
Number of playing cards = 52
Number of suits = 4
Number of cards per suit = 13
Number of black suits = 2
Number of red suits = 2
2. Suppose E1 = the outcome is a red card and E2 = the outcome is a face card (K, Q, J). Determine P(E1 or E2).
P (E1) = Number of red cards/Total of playing cards
P (E1) = 26/52 = 1/2 = 50%
P (E2) = Number of face cards/Total of playing cards
P (E2) = 12/52 = 3/13 = 23%
Answer:
Around the 3 + 6:-
(3 + 6) x 9 + 3
Step-by-step explanation:
(3 + 6) x 9 + 3
= 9 x 9 + 3
= 84.
