Answer:
The area below the line is shaded.
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the zero-interval test [test point (0, 0)], we plug in 0 for both <em>y</em><em> </em>and <em>x</em><em> </em>to determine whether we shade <em>below the </em><em>line</em><em> </em>[the portion that DOES contain the origin] or <em>above</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>line</em><em> </em>[the portion that does not contain the origin]. This is where me must verify the inequality as false or true:
![\displaystyle 0 < 2[0] + 1 → 0 < 1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%200%20%3C%202%5B0%5D%20%2B%201%20%E2%86%92%200%20%3C%201)
This is a genuine statement, therefore we shade <em>below</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>line</em>.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
The answer is D.
The first one says you add -4 each time in the sequence.
The second says you add -2 each time in the sequence.
The third says you multiply by -2 each time in the sequence.
The fourth says you multiply by -4 each time in the sequence.
-2*-4=8
8*-4=-32
the equation of the new function is:

<h3>What is the equation of the new function?</h3>
We have a function:

And we want to shift it five units to the right, and seven units down, then the new function will be:

If we now replace f(x), we get:

That is the equation of the new function.
If you want to learn more about translations:
brainly.com/question/24850937
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is 12.36
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did the assignment and guessed and got them wrong and it said this is the right answer so yeah.
You're welcome!! :D
A is the correct answer I believe