Answer: Skilled craftsman were often replaced by unskilled machine operaters
Explanation:
lowkey heres some short simple answers
1 interest loans
2 in return for keeping their money safe the bank can strike a deal to use ur money and u slowly gain money over time should the money remain in the bank
3 limited liability company or corporation because it helps shield their personal assets from things that might happen in the future
4 The central bank. its there for a flexible and more stable monetary and financial system.
5 it lowers interest rates allowing opportunity for new investments and spending
6 when banks make loans out of excess reserves it increases the money supply
those my half hearted probs wrong answers for you
additional info surrounding Q1 and Q2: The amount of interest the banks collect on the loans is greater than the amount of interest they pay to customers with savings accounts
He won a constitutional amendment that removed Congress's power to overturn vetoes.
And it’s Presidency, Have a good day.
Answer:
slave revolts!
Explanation:
Hello!
Slave owners lived in constant fear of slave revolts, and justly so. The average holding varied between four and six slaves, and at the peak of slavery in the US slaves occupied more than 20% of the population. If slaves were to get fed up with their horrible situation they might be able to overpower their masters and begin freeing slaves from other plantations. These fears were further amplified by the Hattian Rebellion in 1791 in which the local slaves brutally killed 75,000 French citizens, gaining their freedom in the process. Many in the United States feared that a similar situation would unfold if their slaves rebelled en masse.
Hope This Helps!
H.M
More info:
https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/25577
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Haitian-Revolution
Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.
