1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
3 years ago
13

Which two factors led to Latin American revolutions?

History
1 answer:
Rudiy273 years ago
3 0
The correct answers here would be B and D because the Invasion of Spain by France is what caused an uproar and since the Spanish Revolted the Latin Americans also saw this as an opportunity to revolt as well. Hope this helped :)
You might be interested in
During the late 1800s, what was a major effect of industrialization on
dsp73

Answer: Skilled craftsman were often replaced by unskilled machine operaters

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST AND GIVE 25 POINTS!! MUST EXPLAIN!! Plz look at the photo and answer the questions!! TYSM!!
Lelechka [254]

lowkey heres some short simple answers

1 interest loans

2 in return for keeping their money safe the bank can strike a deal to use ur money and u slowly gain money over time should the money remain in the bank

3  limited liability company or corporation because it helps shield their personal assets from things that might happen in the future

4 The central bank. its there for a flexible and more stable monetary and financial system.

5 it lowers interest rates allowing opportunity for new investments and spending

6 when banks make loans out of excess reserves it increases the money supply

those my half hearted probs wrong answers for you

additional info surrounding Q1 and Q2: The amount of interest the banks collect on the loans is greater than the amount of interest they pay to customers with savings accounts

8 0
3 years ago
How did franklin Delano Roosevelt expand powers of the presedncy
worty [1.4K]
He won a constitutional amendment that removed Congress's power to overturn vetoes.

And it’s Presidency, Have a good day.
6 0
3 years ago
While actually rare, Southerners lived in fear of
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

slave revolts!

Explanation:

Hello!

Slave owners lived in constant fear of slave revolts, and justly so. The average holding varied between four and six slaves, and at the peak of slavery in the US slaves occupied more than 20% of the population. If slaves were to get fed up with their horrible situation they might be able to overpower their masters and begin freeing slaves from other plantations. These fears were further amplified by the Hattian Rebellion in 1791 in which the local slaves brutally killed 75,000 French citizens, gaining their freedom in the process. Many in the United States feared that a similar situation would unfold if their slaves rebelled en masse.

Hope This Helps!

H.M

More info:

https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/25577

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Haitian-Revolution

4 0
2 years ago
Do the actions taken against the armenians seem like acceptable wartime actions?
Rashid [163]

Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which countries were under Ancient Rome rule?
    11·1 answer
  • Match these items.
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the first explorer to attempt to reach East Asia by sailing west from Europe?
    8·2 answers
  • The key issues the United States based fighting Japan across the Pacific ocean
    11·1 answer
  • Under mercantilism the thirteen American colonies were expected to provide Great Britain with
    6·1 answer
  • 10)<br> The "Fall Line" is the dividing points between which two geographic regions in Georgia?
    6·1 answer
  • A noble gas is least likely to?
    5·1 answer
  • Que es el analisis de la patria petrolera venezolana
    11·1 answer
  • The main concern of the Anti-federalist was what?
    12·1 answer
  • What area in the US would be similar to the Fertile Crescent? Explain your answer. I NEED IT AS FAST AS POSSIBLE ITS DUE IN 2 HO
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!