Answer:
A. ACL
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the most essential antispoofing technique would be ACL or Access Control Lists. This tool limits access to the router to only those on the list and thus preventing spoofing on the routers. Which is why it is a top recommendation by Cisco for this type of scenario.
Answer:
nominal, real, & the classical dichotomy
Explanation:
A nominal variable is a value whose values are non-numeric for example gender. It is calculated based on the current – year prices.
In other words, nominal value is calculated in monetary terms, whereas real value is measured on the basis of goods or services
A real variable is a variable whose values are numeric. It is measured based on the currency of the base year.
The distinction between real variables and nominal variables is known as <u>nominal, real, & the classical dichotomy</u>.
The Classical Dichotomy is based on the assumption that states that in the long run, the nominal economy and the real economy are completely separated from each other. In the long run, nominal prices have no impacts on real variables.
<h3>From the given scenario, it can be inferred that Hearthstone Electronics and Influx Electronics share differentiation parity.
</h3>
Explanation:
A business achieves differentiation of parity when it generates the same perceived value as its rival organization. A cost leader will achieve a competitive advantage as long as its generated economic value is greater than its competitors'.
The parity of differentiation deals with value and not with pricing. Parity to differentiation happens when a business generates the same value as its rival. Price parity means paying the same prices as a rival, with pricing involved.
Answer:
It is a better deal to keep the old equipment
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&New&Old&Differential\\$leasing cost&0&-23,000&23,000\\$operarting cost&-26,000&-12,500&-13,500\\$operating income&-26,000&-35,500&9,500\\$tax shield&4,200&0&4,200\\$Result&-21,800&-35,500&13,700\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26New%26Old%26Differential%5C%5C%24leasing%20cost%260%26-23%2C000%2623%2C000%5C%5C%24operarting%20cost%26-26%2C000%26-12%2C500%26-13%2C500%5C%5C%24operating%20income%26-26%2C000%26-35%2C500%269%2C500%5C%5C%24tax%20shield%264%2C200%260%264%2C200%5C%5C%24Result%26-21%2C800%26-35%2C500%2613%2C700%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
each year the new equipment generates a 13,700 adidtional cash outflow
We should check if the cost saving per year at 8% will have a present value lower than the proceed from the sale:
C 13,700.00
time 5
rate 0.08
PV $59,076.1377
As the differential cost exceeds the amount of proceed we would get if the old equipment is sold we already conclude we should keep it
Answer:
If the offer is rejected by the Dall then the offer is no more in place. The particular reason is that Martin is not required to tell Dall that the offer is no more in place. Suppose Martin is wishing to close his offer and till now Dall has not declined the offer. So Martin will have to communicate Dall that the offer is been closed. If Dall has communicated Martin that he has rejected the offer, then this means the offer essence has vanished. Hence Martin has no liability towards Dall, if Dall sues him.
