Benefits of small amounts of inflation include more expansionary monetary policy, the placebo effect, and the facilitation of relative price changes.
<h3>What is meant by inflation?</h3>
Inflation is the term used to describe the rate of price rise for goods and services.
It is sometimes used to categorize inflation according to cost-push, demand-pull, and built-in factors.
The two most popular inflation measures are the Consumer Price Index and the Wholesale Price Index.
Inflation can be viewed favorably or badly depending on the perspective and rate of change.
Inflation may be advantageous for those who own tangible assets since it will raise the value of their holdings, such as real estate or goods that are kept in storage.
Inflation's primary causes include:
- Consumer-driven inflation
- Price-driven inflation
- more money available
- Devaluation
- increasing pay
- Regulations and policies
Benefits of Inflation: In order to meet increasing demand, production must increase. Additionally, debtors benefit from inflation because they can return their loans with funds that are less valuable than the funds they borrowed. This promotes borrowing and lending, which boosts expenditure on all levels once more.
To know more about inflation refer to: brainly.com/question/15692461
#SPJ4
Answer:
Economy's marginal social benefit=$65
Explanation:
The economy's marginal social benefit can be calculated by getting the average of the individual marginal benefit.
This can be expressed as;
Economy's marginal social benefit=Sum of individual marginal benefit/Total number of individual's
where;
Sum of individual marginal benefit=John's marginal benefit+Nick's marginal benefit+Christina's marginal benefit=(80+50+65)=$195
Total number of individuals=3
replacing;
Economy's marginal social benefit=195/3=65
Economy's marginal social benefit=$65
This is a true fact, what is the question though?
Question: The question is incomplete. See the full question below and the answer.
You are an up-and-coming developer in downtown Seattle and are interested in constructing a building on a site you own. You have collected four bids from prospective contractors. The bids include both a cost ($millions) and time to completion (months):
Contractor Cost Time
A 100 20
B 80 25
C 79 28
D 82 26
The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose. B has indicated that for another $20 million, he could do the job in 18 months, and you have said that you would be indifferent between that bid and the original proposal. In talking with C, you have indicated that you would just as soon pay her an extra $million if she could get the job done in 26 months. Who gets the job? Explain your reasoning. (It may be convenient to plot the four alternatives on a graph.)
Answer:
See the explanation for the answer and find attached of the graph.
Explanation:
So we draw a regression line of Time vs Cost and best fit a curve based on the data given, given in the above figure. The four alternatives are marked in the figure as well. Our main objective is to reduce both time and cost, but that might not be possible So the best thing would be to look for alternatives which lie below the line. If C gets an extra million, then that point would come below the regression line, and it would be a better alternative than D, because for the same time we are getting the job done at a cheaper cost.
Also if B is paid extra 20 million, that point also comes below the regression line, and hence will be a better alternative than A because for the same cost again we are getting the job done earlier. We need to choose between B and C. Now in order to optimise both cost and time, we need to choose a point close to the middle point of the regression line segment in 1st quadrant. We see that C is much more closer to the middle point and hence seems like a better option.
So we choose C as our contractor if we consider B's alternative bid, but if we do not consider B's alternative bid and stick to the original one, we choose B as our contractor.
Answer:
Check the following explanations.
Explanation:
1. The benefits of global marketing for IKEA are:
1. Economies of scale in production and distribution of their products. – refers increased cost savings due to increased production and distribution which eventually increase the revenue of the firm.
2. Diversifying company markets through growth and expansion means its market share and customer base is increased.
3. Company’s reputation is improved- IKEA has now become world famous and the market leader in the industry.
4. IKEA’s power and scope of business has increased in the multiple markets which has made IKEA the most sought after furniture retailing company in Europe and Germany.
2. The fact that Ikea strives to lower costs, minimizes materials and packing, and has catalogs that are completely recyclable shows the company’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) towards the community.
3. One reason for the relatively slow growth in the United States is that its stores are franchised by Netherlands-based Inter IKEA Systems, which carefully scrutinizes potential franchisees—individuals or companies—for strong financial backing and a proven record in retailing.
4. IKEA has used franchising and distribution as the mode of entry into the foreign market.
