1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maw [93]
3 years ago
5

A victim of a robbery is describing the suspect to you. The victim tells you the robber was holding a "38 special" handgun. Expl

ain what information this tells you about the size of the suspects firearm
Law
1 answer:
meriva3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

This means that the length of the gun is 38cm.

Explanation:

The victim says the robber was holding a "38 special" handgun. The 38 special gun is the type which has a length of 38cm in length.

This information tells more about the type of gun to look out for and the licensed owner of the gun types which matches the victim’s description of the suspect.

You might be interested in
If party is unhappy with the decision handed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, what is their next step?
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

have a meeting to decide what they are going to do

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?
Drupady [299]

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Explain the steps in the arrest and prosecution of someone who is accused of a felony. Your response should be at least 150 word
choli [55]

Answer:

take what you need

Explanation:

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

Sentencing

During the sentencing phase of a criminal case, the court determines the appropriate punishment for the convicted defendant. In determining a suitable sentence, the court will consider a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, the defendant's personal circumstances and the degree of remorse felt by the defendant.

Appeal

An individual convicted of a crime may ask that his or her case be reviewed by a higher court. If that court finds an error in the case or the sentence imposed, the court may reverse the conviction or find that the case should be re-tried.

4 0
3 years ago
Giving away another brainliest!!
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

Ooooo thank you for the points :)

Have a good day

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following are processes by which state judges can be removed from office?
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

As far as I know, the only way to remove a state judge is impeachment by the state legislature. Remember, this is as far as I know but I'm pretty sure it is correct.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • michael josephson Its a sign of troubled times when the concept of pressure becomes an acceptable excuse for ethical shortcuts a
    6·1 answer
  • What questions do filibusters raise about the American Democracy?
    15·1 answer
  • This quotation represents a major principle of us foreign policy known as _______
    12·1 answer
  • Help me pleaseeeeeeeeeeee
    13·1 answer
  • Necesito 3 ejemplos de objetos de actos juridicos ejemplo de un acto celebrado por escritura publica/intervencion de oficial pub
    7·1 answer
  • Help me answer this questions please
    11·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
    5·1 answer
  • For a powerboat to be operated in compliance with the law, in addition to registration number what else is required?
    12·1 answer
  • Person's motor skills are
    12·2 answers
  • To meet the standard for the duty of care, a person must:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!