Answer:
I think the answer is public nuisance.
Explanation:
I believe this because it is not an invasion of privacy at all, it can't be trespassing because she is not trespassing, it is not intentional even though she did ignore your claims.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
D. a loose interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.
Explanation:
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1801 till his death in 1835. Without any prior study in law, he studied law in only just six weeks.
Under Supreme Court's decision under Chief Justice John Marshall upheld Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton advocated broad and liberal interpretation of the Constitution. This belief was upheld by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Supreme Court uphelded a loose and liberal interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Answer: It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads
Explanation:
Answer:
put Allen in the position he would have been in if Amy had performed the contract.
Explanation: Compensatory damages are further categorized into special damages, which are economic losses such as loss of earnings, property damage and medical expenses, and general damages, which are non-economic damages such as pain and suffering and emotional distress.
Compensatory damages are an award of a sum of money which aims to compensate the claimant for his loss under the contract.
