Answer:Trees are renewable because they can be replenished, however they are also nonrenewable due to a lack of supply of wood.
Explanation: It takes a very long time for trees to be replenished.
New and improved tools and technologies exist that help prevent inadvertent shock and electrocution hazards with underground energized utilities, including Non-conductive tools, Non-conductive backhoe buckets, Ground penetrating radar, Underground 3-D imaging.
Electrocution is defined as the death or serious harm brought on by electric shock from the body's electrical current.
Contact with electrical sources, such as malfunctioning machinery, contact with power lines, and inappropriate extension cable usage can all result in electrocution. High voltage is carried by power lines that are both overhead and subterranean. Simply staying away from electrical lines is the simplest strategy to prevent electrocution from them.
To learn more about electrocution here brainly.com/question/1810934
#SPJ4
Not all instances of computer theft and computer fraud fall under existing statues because the property stolen may be intangible.
The computer fraud and abuse act of 1986 (CFAA) is a United States cybersecurity bill that was enacted in 1986 as an amendment to existing computer fraud law which had been included in the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. The law prohibits accessing a computer without authorization, or in excess of authorization. Prior to computer-specific criminal laws, computer crimes were prosecuted as mail and wire fraud, but the applying law was often insufficient.
The CFAA was written to extend existing tort law to intangible property, while, in theory, limiting federal jurisdiction to cases with a compelling federal interest, where computers of the federal government or certain financial institutions are involved or where the crime itself is interstate in nature.
To learn more about CFAA here
brainly.com/question/27857666
#SPJ4
There is considerable confusion regarding the ethical appropriateness of using incentives in research with human subjects. Previous work on determining whether incentives are unethical considers them as a form of undue influence or coercive offer. We understand the ethical issue of undue influence as an issue, not of coercion, but of corruption of judgment. By doing so we find that, for the most part, the use of incentives to recruit and retain research subjects is innocuous. But there are some instances where it is not. Specifically, incentives become problematic when conjoined with the following factors, singly or in combination with one another: where the subject is in a dependency relationship with the researcher, where the risks are particularly high, where the research is degrading, where the participant will only consent if the incentive is relatively large because the participant's aversion to the study is strong, and where the aversion is a principled one. The factors we have identified and the kinds of judgments they require differ substantially from those considered crucial in most previous discussions of the ethics of employing incentives in research with human subjects.
