Kiko still thinks of herself as a struggling student although as a college student her gpa is a 3. 5. this is an example of cognitive conservatism.
Cognitive conservatism deals with on seeking information that agrees with how one sees his self-concept. Self-concept are the set of perceptions one holds of self both physically and emotionally. It leads us to seek out people who support our self-concept.
Cognitive conservatism make it such that once we believe something, we tend to pay special attention to those experiences and situations that are consistent with our beliefs and disregard those that are inconsistent with our beliefs. Self-monitoring is defined by experts as traits of individuals on the basis of which they are willing and able to regulate and adapt their behaviour in accordance with social norms presented through various everyday situations and social demands.
Learn more about self montoring:
brainly.com/question/14226475
#SPJ4
Answer:
China is an autocratic government today.
Japan is a democratic goverenment today.
Mongolia is a democratic govenment today.
Taiwan is a democratic goverenment today.
Explanation:
China functions as a socialist republic governed by a single party, communist, led by a general secretary.
Japan is a monarchy by the constitution, with the emperor in its entirety, or the emperor having ceremonial duties only.
Mongolia is Republic with a multiparty system. The President and the Government have the highest power.
Taiwan's political status is uncertain because China does not recognize it and it claims to be its territory.
Is there any specific context?
Generally during the times of violence, no one can escape it. It is true that there are gender differences (women are often raped, men more often murdered) but in war both genders (and children) always suffer.
Answer:
Gender equality is where you have the same rights, benefits, and opportunities reguarless of your gender. Meaning you can't be suppressed and oppressed due to what you identify as.
Answer:
Answer is Option B: that she was under undo duress from her son and daughter-in-law and that the agreement is voidable.
Explanation:
When the broker came to offer Mrs. G, the price he offered was quite less than what she was asking for. Still his son and his wife urged her to sign the offer. So, later she can claim that she was under a lot of threat and violence from her son and daughter-in-law to sign the offer and it would make the agreement voidable.
She cannot claim about Broker's offering less price, as per Option A. Neither she can say that Broker defrauded them, as per Option C. Option D is also incorrect as it says that her consumer rights were taken illegally by her son and his wife.
