Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: This employee should be granted access based on his current and past roles only after being formally reviewed for his effectiveness in the company. 
Explanation:
To begin with, if the employee has past through several positions before then he must understand quite a bit how the company works in its whole and moreover that employee must be trusted due to the fact of the times that he was promoted and therefore that he must have granted access based on his current and past roles but only after being formally reviewed because of the fact of ensuring the effectiveness of the employee. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
c. Sales budget, budgeted income statement, budgeted balance sheet 
Explanation:
First, we calculate the sales for the period. It would also calculatethe cash proceeds from sales, which will be useful for the balance sheet.
With that, we can plug sales revenue into the income statement and calcualte the net income.
And with the income statement, we can solve for retained earnings and build up the balance sheet. Among other data
Doing it in any other order, we are going to leave blanks and need to do the next one to fill them. In the proposed orde,r we do not need information from the subsequent budget to complete the previous one, which is good.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is D: $10,329
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You want to have the equivalent of $700,000 (in terms of today's spending power) when you retire in 30 years. Assume a 3% rate of annual inflation. The interest rate is 10% annual.
First, we need to determine how much is $700,000 in 30 years. 
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 700000*(1.03^30)= $1,699,083.73
Now, we can calculate the annual payment required using the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual payment
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= (1,699,083.73* 0.10)/[(1.10^30)-1]= $10329
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C) performance of the contract is commercially impracticable.
Explanation:
Contract law contemplates certain situations where performing the contract is either difficult or impossible and therefore the party is not liable for breaching the contract. 
Commercial impracticability applies to contracts where the performance of at least one party is impracticable and cannot be accomplished.
In this case, Quinn cannot perform his duty since the price of scrap steel increased beyond any reasonable price contemplated in the contract. Since Quinn is not responsible for setting the price of scrap steel, he is not liable for breaching the contract.