Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gap is: Cartels generate the highest joint profit, they want to avoid a price war that leads to profit erosion and P=MC, a cournot oligopoly will generate more profit than a bertrand oligopoly
Explanation:
In Bertrand's model, consumers will buy the goods of the company that offers the lowest price. From this it can be intuited that the Nash equilibrium will be the one in which both companies set the same price. For this reason it is not attractive, since they are competition and for some of the two it may not be profitable to decrease the sale price of their products.
Answer:
Depletion
Explanation:
The process of transferring the cost of metal ores and other minerals removed from the earth to an expense account is called Depletion
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cash A/c Dr $6,240
Credit card expense A/c Dr $260 ($6,500 × 4%)
To Sales A/c $6,500
(Being the deposit is recorded)
For recording the deposit, we debited the cash account, credit card expense and credited the sales account so that the proper posting can be done.
Answer:
c)Short term capital gain.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the land is purchased by Sol as on Feb 12,2018 for $85,000 and the land was sold by Sol as on Jan 31, 2019 for $90,000 in cash
So as we can see the difference in the purchase date and sale date would be less than one year and the transactions related to the capital assets would be termed as capital gain
Since it is less than one year so it is a short term capital gain
Hence, the correct option is c.
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
