Answer:
The answer is: Buyers will bid the asset's price down until it equals the present value of income.
Explanation:
As the current asset price is greater than the present value of income, it is overpriced.
So, seller is much willing to sell at this price, however, buyers does not want to buy asset at this price as they only want to purchase it at the price equals to the present value of its income.
So, Buyers will bid the asset's price down until it equals the present value of income which is the level they are willing to buy and also at which the seller is willing to sell also.
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
Answer:
Oct 31
Dr Cash $7,201
Cr Notes receivable—R. Albany $7,000
Cr Interest revenue $201
Explanation:
Preparation of Jun's journal entry assuming the note is honored by the customer on October 31, of that same year
Oct 31
Dr Cash $7,201
($7,000+$201)
Cr Notes receivable—R. Albany $7,000
Cr Interest revenue $201
(11.5%*7,000*90/360)
Answer:
$1510.28
Explanation:
The monthly on the purchase of new sports car can be computed using the pmt excel function as shown below:
=pmt(rate,nper,-pv,fv)
rate is APR of 7.15% expressed in monthly terms i.e 7.15%/12
nper is the number of months that payments would last i.e 60 months
pv is the cost of the new sports car i.e $76000
fv is the balance owed after the 60th payment i.e $0
=pmt(7.15%/12,60,-76000,0)=$1510.28
