The answer is $7 because Marginal revenue is the change in total revenue from 10 customers ($400) to 11 customers ($407) How a monopolist maximizes profits
How does a monopolist determine its profit-maximizing level of output How does it determine the price that it charges?
The monopolist will select the profit-maximizing level of output where
MR = MC
and then charge the price for that quantity of output as determined by the market demand curve. If that price is above average cost, the monopolist earns positive profits.
How a monopolist maximizes profits
Because Chuck, a sole commercial airplane operator in small isolated town, has no competition, he has complete control of market price of air travel in his small tone
Reduced price → increase in ticket sales
Monopoly maximizes profit by choosing an amount of profit in which marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR= MC) Since Chuck must reduce his price to sell more units, he has an incentive to sell a smaller quantity than a perfective competitive company
Learn more about Marginal revenue :
brainly.com/question/10822075
#SPJ4
Non covalent interactions within the macro molecules determine the three dimensional structures of the macro molecules. Non covalent interactions are also involved in many biological processes in which large molecules bind specifically and transiently to one another. <span />
Answer:
From the attached excel file, we havee:
Revenue and spending income from operations variance = $4,566 Favorable
Activity income from operations variance = -$5,860 Unfavorable
Explanation:
Note: See part a of the attached excel file for the flexible budget performance report that shows both revenue and spending variances and activity variances for September.
Also Note: See parts b and c of the attached excel file for the calculations of revenue and spending variances and activity variances respectively for September.
Answer:
C) I only.
Explanation:
According to the Uniform Securities Act, A civil case underneath the provisions of the United States must be filed in 3 years of the alleged infringement, or 2 years from the detection of the breach, whatever comes first.
Also, The passing of the consultant or the client doesn't really eliminate a civil liability prima facie case. Waivers to statements agreed to sign by the customer waiving adherence by the consultant with the provisions of this act on which the suit is focused aren't ever legitimate on the examination.
Therefore the option i is correct
