Answer:
The answer is "Option a".
Explanation:
In this question, each year Barb pays back the interest received. It will add depth to its principle during the first year. In this, the actual case, the interest for $3000 at 5% for the first year = $150, would be added to $3 000, and $31,50. In the second year, Barb should gain a 5% interest on $3150. Throughout the case of Andy, the second principle will be $3000 like it was at the end of the first year. Thus, Barb's second year is going to have more interest.
- In choice b, It is wrong because Andy wants to withdraw its interest, this won't get irritated. He would also receive less interest per year than Barb.
- In choice c, Its interest would not be the same for both in the first year.
- In choice d, It is wrong because Andy wants to withdraw interest each year, no compound interest will arise.
- In choice e, No, not that. Andy won't earn the interest compounded so, the Barb will receive the interest multiplied. Therefore, for the five-year duration, Barb can earn more interest.
Answer:
reposition
Explanation:
Reposition -
It is the method by which the status of the brand is changed in comparison to that of the other competing brands , is knows as the process of reposition .
This process is affected by the changes occurring in the marketing mix against the change in the market , or it could be any reason which disables the objective of the brand's market .
hence , from the question , the correct term for the given information is reposition .
Answer:
The correct option is D, outcome-based ethics.
Explanation:
Duty-based ethics preaches the idea that one should be seen doing the right thing at all times regardless of the consequences of one's actions, it is unlike the utilitarian approach to ethics where what is wrong or right is a function of having the greatest good for the greatest number of people not minding whether the approach used is wrong or right.
Corporate social responsibility involves the additional efforts put in by corporations in a bid to give back to society.
Religious ethical principles is about concluding on right or wrong using the lenses of religion.
Outcome-based ethics is a sharp contrast to duty-based ethics, as the outcome or consequence is what justifies the moral right or wrong. in other words the end justifies the means.
Answer:
Fabiola pays 27.0963 dollars for 8.79877 gallons of fuel.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that,
Fabiola pays 357 pesos for 40 liters of fuel.
It is required to convert the amount in dollars.
Since, we know that,
1 peso = 0.0759 dollars
So, 357 pesos = 0.0759 × 357 = 27.0963 dollars
Moreover,
1 liter = 0.219969 gallons
So, 40 liters = 0.219969 × 40 = 8.79877 gallons
Thus, we get that,
Fabiola pays 27.0963 dollars for 8.79877 gallons of fuel.
