Answer:
6x
Step-by-step explanation:
4x² - 8x + 8 - x² + 2x - 4 - 3x² + <u>6x</u> = 4
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
Quadratic
Step-by-step explanation:
A linear equation is just a line and an exponential function goes in the same direction
A quadratic us a parabola which has a turning point
Answer:
i beleive the answer would be 90
Step-by-step explanation:
im begginggggggg, begging, beg youuuuu
Answer:
It is shifted c units to the left .
Step-by-step explanation:
In general, adding a constant c to the value of x shifts a graph c units to the left.
The graph of y = x + c is parallel to y = x, the y-intercept becomes (0, c) and the x-intercept becomes (-c, 0).
In the diagram below, the red line is the graph of y = x, and the blue line is the graph of y = x + 1.