According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Professional athletes attempting only to maximize income will defer larger salaries if DEFERRED PAYOUTS ARE ADJUSTED UPWARD TO COMPENSATE FOR FOREGONE INTERESTS.
If professional athletes, whose sole aim is larger income are asked to wait for sometime before collecting their salaries, with the promise that their incomes will be raise for the period of their waiting, then, most of them will gladly agree to the arrangement, since, they are sure of higher amounts.
A functional/hybrid resume would be more suitable for this situation.
Chronological order is normally most supportive when itemizing work understanding, so a potential boss can see where you worked and for to what extent, so it isn't as simple to apply chronological order to your group inclusion or broad preparing.
Answer:
E
Explanation:
In this question, we are told to state what the reaction of Koka and Zola will be;
Kukla and Zola both like the proposal. As according to the given opportunity cost for Kukla (3 rugs per every 4 tables) she can get 1.5 rugs for 2 tables .But with the offer made now she can get 2 rugs for giving 2 tables.
Given the opportunity cost for Zola ( 2 tables per every 3 rugs ) she must give 3 rugs for getting 2 tables. But with the offer made she can now get 2 tables for giving away only 2 rugs .
So both Kukla and Zola are happy with the offer.
Answer:
The revenue recognition principle
Explanation:
The revenue recognition principle states that revenue should be recorded when services have been performed or products have been delivered to customers and not when cash is received for the service rendered
For example, if a supplier delivers 10,000 worth of goods to consumers in November and is paid for the goods in December. Revenue should be recognised in November and not December.