All categories

3 years ago

Choose the most accurate statement based on the graph shown.

Mathematics

2 answers:

bezimeni [28]3 years ago

8 0

The graph is misleading because the vertical range is too small creating the impression that differences are greater than they actually are.

Eddi Din [679]3 years ago

4 0

The most accurate would be the second statement: <span>The graph is misleading because it uses 3-dimensional bars.

The vertical range is just enough. It only appears small because the bars are in 3D. It should have been in 2D so that we could directly trace it to how much frequency each category is. Even the axes are in 3D also.</span>

You might be interested in

Rewrite y + 1 = -2x – 3 in standard form

Misha Larkins [42]

The algebraic expressions can be written as

$a+b+c=0$

The given expression is,

$\begin{gathered} y+1=-2x-3 \\ -2x-y=1+3 \\ -2x-y=4 \\ -2x-y-4=0 \\ 2x+y+4=0 \end{gathered}$

7 0

1 year ago

Don't know this please help

nikitadnepr [17]

I would say answer number 2

6 0

3 years ago

Help me with this please !!

avanturin [10]

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Under a reflection in the line y = - x

a point (x, y ) → (- y, - x ), thus

T(- 1, 3 ) → T'(- 3, 1 )

U(- 1, 10 ) → U'(- 10, 1 )

V(- 2, 4 ) → V'(- 4, 2 )

6 0

3 years ago

You don't need to construct a Venn Diagram, it is just part of the instruction. Just determine whether or not the argument is va

icang [17]

Answer:

It is valid.

Venn Diagram is attached.

I also provided a truth table.

I also provided a couple of names this argument could be called.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this question.

Thank you kindly.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a person is a poet, then that person is a loner.

If a person is a loner, then that person is a taxi driver.

If a person is a poet, then that person is a taxi drive.

This is in the form:

p->q

q->r

Therefore, p->r.

This is an example of a hypothetical syllogism.

The first thing my mind goes to when seeing this is the transitive property which says if A is related to B and B is related to C then A is related to C.

So this syllogism also has another name and it is called the principle of transitivity of implication.

Let p=person is a poet, q=person is a loner, and r=person is a taxi driver.

I'm going to make a truth table and compare the truth values of the propositions to the conclusion.

Since we have 3 variables, we are going to need 2^3=8 rows.

p q r p->q q->r (p->q) and (q->r) conclusion=(p->r)

T T T T T T T

T T F T F F F

T F T F T F T

T F F F T F F

F F F T T T T

F F T T T T T

F T F T F F T

F T T T T T T

So we are trying to see if we ever have the preposition part true and the conclusion false.

That doesn't happen so the argument is valid.

5 0

4 years ago

What would Y be equal to in the problem 0.5x + 0.6y = 5.4

Alla [95]

Answer:

y = - $\frac{5}{6}$ x + 9

Step-by-step explanation:

0.5x + 0.6y = 5.4

0.6y = -0.5x + 5.4

Multiply 10 on all sides.

6y = -5x + 54

Divide 6 on all sides.

y = - $\frac{5}{6}$ x + 9

7 0

2 years ago