What are the answers to help
There's a bunch of popular hats around the world so it depends :D
Answer:limited perception
Explanation:The courage to define yourself.We must not allow other people's limited perceptions to define us. It is hard to believe just how much time I have wasted worrying about how other people have seen me, what they have thought of me, what they have considered me to be, the value they have seen in me. I somehow grew up putting a great deal of value in other people's perceptions of who I am and what I am worth, even when those people really have not known much about me at all. Because of this tendency, I have made many of my decisions in life based on what I have thought other people would think about me and my decisions actions. I have rejected possible relationships because of what I thought other people would think about me if I went out with a certain girl. I have not pursued certain careers because of the judgments that I was sure other people would pass on my choice of professions. I have not pursued certain passions because I did not want people to think less of me. I have also lost an amazing number of opportunities in my life. And while I am not going to spend today regretting what I did or did not do yesterday, I know that my life could be much more fulfilling today if I had not worried so much about what others thought earlier in my life. I wanted to be the person that I thought others wanted to see, so that they would accept me more fully. But that acceptance would have been conditional, which is the worst type of acceptance that we can possibly pursue.
Bicameral means with two chambers (bi- is 2 and camera means chambers). A legislative body with one chamber would be called unicameral. The correct answer is B.
Thanks to decisions by the Supreme Court, home ownership in the United States is more inclusive of other races apart from White Americans.
Both before and after the Fair Housing Act formally made it illegal to discriminate based on a person's race and gender, the Supreme Court made some decisions that tried to make home ownership more inclusive such as:
- Shelley v. Kraemer - here the Supreme Court ruled that it was not possible to enforce covenants in the deeds to property that were restrictive based on race.
- Jones v. Mayer Co. - the Supreme Court ruled that any form of racial discrimination in home ownership was illegal
These are just two cases where the Supreme Court's decision affected homeownership but there are more.
We can conclude however, that based on the Supreme Court's decisions, homeownership is more inclusive of other races.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2630375.</em>
