Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section.
Explanation:
If the wages of the Hispanics construction worker in America are less then, they will not have near as much money to send home to their relatives back in Mexico.
And if their families do not have as much as it use to be then they will not be able to buy near as much as they used to.
It means that if the construction workers don't get as much money as they used to then, neither they nor their families will be able to spend as much as they use to which will obviously hurt each of their economies.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": deliver goods in conformity with the contract.
Explanation:
The perfect tender rule states that in a sales contract of goods, the seller must provide the buyer with the products that match perfectly the buyer's need. This rule is opposed to the <em>substantial performance</em> that states that at least part of the contract agreed must be fulfilled so that it can be considered legit.
