From what you are saying, you are asking the pros and cons of having internet in a medical office and not using the internet for medical advice. But here are really the only reasons that I can think of:
Pros:
1. The internet can help people stay connected. Having internet allows the office to contact others such as other medical offices or simply customers.
2. Being connected to the internet allows the office to store/connect to public storages/databases such as a cloud which provides for organization and space int he office.
Cons:
1. The internet can be used as a distraction which would allow employees to go on the internet for personal use such as computer games or social media.
2. Being connected to the internet brings about a much larger risk of being hacked since medical offices are connected to databases which contains consumer information, it will be a target for hackers. If you look up "Medical record hacks" you will find articles explaining this problem.
This is about all the information that I can give. If there is anything else that I can do, ring me up :)
Given:
Standard production = 16,000 units × 2 pounds = 32,000
Standard material per pound = $2
Actual production = 33,000
Actual material per pound = $1.8
Find:
Materials budget variance = ?
Computation of materials budget variance.
Materials budget variance = Total Actual Amount - Total Standard Amount
Materials budget variance = (33,000 × $1.8) - (32,000 × $2)
Materials budget variance = ($59,400) - ($64,000)
Materials budget variance = $4,600 favorable
Note: It is considered in the interest of the business when the estimated cost is less than the actual cost.
Answer:
Options 1 - 4 are True but 5 is FALSE
Explanation:
All options given are indicators of economic growth and strong economic performance
When considering the economic prospects of a country, it can be said that: 1. the advantages of building brand loyalty and gaining experience in a country's business practices is greater for a last-mover than for a first-mover <em>because the last-mover has the chance to learn from the mistakes of the first-mover and perfect on them</em>
2. countries which do not have property rights protection tend to achieve greater economic growth rates because<em> </em><em><u>prosperity and property rights are inextricably linked</u></em><em>. The importance of having well-defined and strongly protected property rights is now widely recognized among economists and policymakers</em>
3. the economic system and property rights regime are reasonably good predictors of economic prospects of a country because <em>widely accepted explanation is that </em><u><em>well-enforced property rights provide incentives for individuals to participate in economic activities, such as investment</em></u><em>, innovation and trade, which lead to a more efficient market.</em>
4. countries where property rights are not well respected and where corruption is rampant always have very low levels of economic growth because as stated in 3 above <u><em>ill-enforced property rights does not provide incentives for individuals to participate in economic activities, such as investment</em></u><em>, innovation and trade, which lead to a more efficient market.</em>
5.countries with command economies tend to achieve greater economic growth rates than free market economies.
<em>This is FALSE because one of the Command economy disadvantages include lack of competition and lack of efficiency.
</em>
<em />
Answer:
The value of m is Three (3)
Explanation:
The annualized return or annual return on investment s the percentage that tells you how much an investment has increased in value on average per year over a period of time.
Annual return can be a preferable metric to use over simple return when you want to evaluate how successful an investment has been or to compare the returns of two investments you've held over different time frames on equal footing.
Now, to calculate the annual returns,
We look up the current price and purchase price.
If the stock has undergone any splits, make sure the purchase price is adjusted for splits. If it isn't, you can adjust it yourself. For example, if you held a stock for 4 years, during which time it has had a 2:1 and a 3:1 split, then you can calculate your split-adjusted purchase price by dividing your purchase price by 6 (2 x 3).
Then we calculate the simple return percentage
After which we go ahead to annualize it.